Underestimation of language issues in frequently used accident investigation methods: A new taxonomy problem found in Dutch accident data

P. Lindhout, C. van Gulijk, B. J.M. Ale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A wide variety of methods exist in the field of accident investigation. The challenge to find the cause for each and every accident has perpetuated a complicated and fundamental debate. In spite of the different paradigms, the many branch specific investigation methods, decades of accumulated and documented accident investigation experience, the diversity in taxonomy of causal factors, and an increasing depth of general systematic analysis tools, there are still causal factors missing out. A recent study identifies language issues as an underestimated danger. Dutch Labour Inspectorate records identify procedures and communication as an important causal factor area for major accidents. Accident investigation method taxonomies that are frequently used in The Netherlands, were investigated on the content related to language issues. Language issues are found to be either present less than proportional with observed accident rates or not present at all in frequently applied accident investigation classification systems. Hence a new taxonomy problem was found in Dutch accident data. Language issues need more attention in accident investigation methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158-162
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Hazardous Materials
Volume191
Issue number1-3
Early online date20 Apr 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Underestimation of language issues in frequently used accident investigation methods: A new taxonomy problem found in Dutch accident data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this