Understanding clinical practice challenges

A survey performed with wound care clinicians to explore wound assessment frameworks

Karen Ousey, Brian Gilchrist, Henry James

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

TIME (Tissue, Inflammation, Moisture, Edges) and other similar wound assessment tools are based on the concept of wound bed preparation. A survey was developed to explore the role and utility of wound assessment tools in current wound care practice. The survey was answered by attendees of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) 2018 conference in Krakow, Poland. Out of 300 attendees invited to answer the survey, 250 fulfilled the requirements to complete the survey. Fifty-four questionnaires were considered invalid due to significant data missing. Data analysis was based on the answers of 196 questionnaire. TIME is the most commonly used wound assessment tool in Europe. Despite clinicians being aware of frameworks for wound bed assessment, 40% of respondents did not use them, and those who used them did so in very variable forms. Data showed variability about beliefs and unbalanced implementation of therapeutic decisions. Variation in wound size and in the characteristics of the wound bed were considered the main factors for the assessment of wound progression. Ideally, assessment tools should be unambiguous, easy to teach, easy to implement by a large base of HCPs and carers, and should guide the clinician consistently through assessment and reassessment processes towards the best therapeutic decision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)58-62
Number of pages5
JournalWounds International
Volume9
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 10 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Surveys and Questionnaires
Inflammation
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Poland
Caregivers
Therapeutics

Cite this

@article{a2c57e0f73f740b7bdbeaece1cb45119,
title = "Understanding clinical practice challenges: A survey performed with wound care clinicians to explore wound assessment frameworks",
abstract = "TIME (Tissue, Inflammation, Moisture, Edges) and other similar wound assessment tools are based on the concept of wound bed preparation. A survey was developed to explore the role and utility of wound assessment tools in current wound care practice. The survey was answered by attendees of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) 2018 conference in Krakow, Poland. Out of 300 attendees invited to answer the survey, 250 fulfilled the requirements to complete the survey. Fifty-four questionnaires were considered invalid due to significant data missing. Data analysis was based on the answers of 196 questionnaire. TIME is the most commonly used wound assessment tool in Europe. Despite clinicians being aware of frameworks for wound bed assessment, 40{\%} of respondents did not use them, and those who used them did so in very variable forms. Data showed variability about beliefs and unbalanced implementation of therapeutic decisions. Variation in wound size and in the characteristics of the wound bed were considered the main factors for the assessment of wound progression. Ideally, assessment tools should be unambiguous, easy to teach, easy to implement by a large base of HCPs and carers, and should guide the clinician consistently through assessment and reassessment processes towards the best therapeutic decision.",
author = "Karen Ousey and Brian Gilchrist and Henry James",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "58--62",
journal = "Wounds International",
issn = "2044-0049",
number = "4",

}

Understanding clinical practice challenges : A survey performed with wound care clinicians to explore wound assessment frameworks. / Ousey, Karen; Gilchrist, Brian ; James , Henry.

In: Wounds International, Vol. 9, No. 4, 10.12.2018, p. 58-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding clinical practice challenges

T2 - A survey performed with wound care clinicians to explore wound assessment frameworks

AU - Ousey, Karen

AU - Gilchrist, Brian

AU - James , Henry

PY - 2018/12/10

Y1 - 2018/12/10

N2 - TIME (Tissue, Inflammation, Moisture, Edges) and other similar wound assessment tools are based on the concept of wound bed preparation. A survey was developed to explore the role and utility of wound assessment tools in current wound care practice. The survey was answered by attendees of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) 2018 conference in Krakow, Poland. Out of 300 attendees invited to answer the survey, 250 fulfilled the requirements to complete the survey. Fifty-four questionnaires were considered invalid due to significant data missing. Data analysis was based on the answers of 196 questionnaire. TIME is the most commonly used wound assessment tool in Europe. Despite clinicians being aware of frameworks for wound bed assessment, 40% of respondents did not use them, and those who used them did so in very variable forms. Data showed variability about beliefs and unbalanced implementation of therapeutic decisions. Variation in wound size and in the characteristics of the wound bed were considered the main factors for the assessment of wound progression. Ideally, assessment tools should be unambiguous, easy to teach, easy to implement by a large base of HCPs and carers, and should guide the clinician consistently through assessment and reassessment processes towards the best therapeutic decision.

AB - TIME (Tissue, Inflammation, Moisture, Edges) and other similar wound assessment tools are based on the concept of wound bed preparation. A survey was developed to explore the role and utility of wound assessment tools in current wound care practice. The survey was answered by attendees of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) 2018 conference in Krakow, Poland. Out of 300 attendees invited to answer the survey, 250 fulfilled the requirements to complete the survey. Fifty-four questionnaires were considered invalid due to significant data missing. Data analysis was based on the answers of 196 questionnaire. TIME is the most commonly used wound assessment tool in Europe. Despite clinicians being aware of frameworks for wound bed assessment, 40% of respondents did not use them, and those who used them did so in very variable forms. Data showed variability about beliefs and unbalanced implementation of therapeutic decisions. Variation in wound size and in the characteristics of the wound bed were considered the main factors for the assessment of wound progression. Ideally, assessment tools should be unambiguous, easy to teach, easy to implement by a large base of HCPs and carers, and should guide the clinician consistently through assessment and reassessment processes towards the best therapeutic decision.

UR - https://www.woundsinternational.com/journals/issue/557/article-details/understanding-clinical-practice-challenges-a-survey-performed-with-wound-care-clinicians-to-explore-wound-assessment-frameworks

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 58

EP - 62

JO - Wounds International

JF - Wounds International

SN - 2044-0049

IS - 4

ER -