Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: the role of reflexivity

Peter Kahn, Lucy Everington, Kathleen Kelm, Iain Reid, Francine Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is important to develop understanding of what underpins the engagement of students in online learning environments. This article reports on a multiple case study that explored student engagement in a set of postgraduate degrees offered on a fully online basis. The study was based on a theorization of student engagement as the exercise of intentional human action,.or agency. It identified ways in which tasks and social relations in the online learning environments triggered reflexivity on the part of students, with ‘reflexivity’ understood to mean the ordinary mental capacity to consider oneself in relation to one’s social setting. A different relationship between reflexivity and student engagement was in view than that identified by Margaret Archer with regard to reflexivity and social mobility. Rather than displaying one dominant mode of reflexivity, the students considered in the study were seen to draw on a range of modes. The engagement of these students in their learning was also seen to depend on the manner in which they engaged in reflexivity centred on the pursuit of shared goals, that is in collective reflexivity. Specific practices were seen to trigger constructive forms of collective reflexivity, while fractured and restricted forms of collective reflexivity were linked to student disengagement in relation to joint tasks. As well as adverting to the importance of collective reflexivity to learning, the study highlights scope for dissonance between the modes of reflexivity and practices favoured by an online learning environment and the reflexive profile of the student.

LanguageEnglish
Pages203-218
Number of pages16
JournalEducational Technology Research and Development
Volume65
Issue number1
Early online date20 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

reflexivity
learning environment
student
joint tasks
disengagement
Social Mobility
Social Relations
learning

Cite this

Kahn, Peter ; Everington, Lucy ; Kelm, Kathleen ; Reid, Iain ; Watkins, Francine. / Understanding student engagement in online learning environments : the role of reflexivity. In: Educational Technology Research and Development. 2017 ; Vol. 65, No. 1. pp. 203-218.
@article{86288f1829fb49f1a08b8aed292a82fe,
title = "Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: the role of reflexivity",
abstract = "It is important to develop understanding of what underpins the engagement of students in online learning environments. This article reports on a multiple case study that explored student engagement in a set of postgraduate degrees offered on a fully online basis. The study was based on a theorization of student engagement as the exercise of intentional human action,.or agency. It identified ways in which tasks and social relations in the online learning environments triggered reflexivity on the part of students, with ‘reflexivity’ understood to mean the ordinary mental capacity to consider oneself in relation to one’s social setting. A different relationship between reflexivity and student engagement was in view than that identified by Margaret Archer with regard to reflexivity and social mobility. Rather than displaying one dominant mode of reflexivity, the students considered in the study were seen to draw on a range of modes. The engagement of these students in their learning was also seen to depend on the manner in which they engaged in reflexivity centred on the pursuit of shared goals, that is in collective reflexivity. Specific practices were seen to trigger constructive forms of collective reflexivity, while fractured and restricted forms of collective reflexivity were linked to student disengagement in relation to joint tasks. As well as adverting to the importance of collective reflexivity to learning, the study highlights scope for dissonance between the modes of reflexivity and practices favoured by an online learning environment and the reflexive profile of the student.",
keywords = "Collective reflexivity, Online learning, Realist social theory, Reflexivity, Student engagement",
author = "Peter Kahn and Lucy Everington and Kathleen Kelm and Iain Reid and Francine Watkins",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "203--218",
journal = "Educational Technology Research and Development",
issn = "1042-1629",
publisher = "Springer Boston",
number = "1",

}

Understanding student engagement in online learning environments : the role of reflexivity. / Kahn, Peter; Everington, Lucy; Kelm, Kathleen; Reid, Iain; Watkins, Francine.

In: Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 65, No. 1, 01.02.2017, p. 203-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding student engagement in online learning environments

T2 - Educational Technology Research and Development

AU - Kahn, Peter

AU - Everington, Lucy

AU - Kelm, Kathleen

AU - Reid, Iain

AU - Watkins, Francine

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - It is important to develop understanding of what underpins the engagement of students in online learning environments. This article reports on a multiple case study that explored student engagement in a set of postgraduate degrees offered on a fully online basis. The study was based on a theorization of student engagement as the exercise of intentional human action,.or agency. It identified ways in which tasks and social relations in the online learning environments triggered reflexivity on the part of students, with ‘reflexivity’ understood to mean the ordinary mental capacity to consider oneself in relation to one’s social setting. A different relationship between reflexivity and student engagement was in view than that identified by Margaret Archer with regard to reflexivity and social mobility. Rather than displaying one dominant mode of reflexivity, the students considered in the study were seen to draw on a range of modes. The engagement of these students in their learning was also seen to depend on the manner in which they engaged in reflexivity centred on the pursuit of shared goals, that is in collective reflexivity. Specific practices were seen to trigger constructive forms of collective reflexivity, while fractured and restricted forms of collective reflexivity were linked to student disengagement in relation to joint tasks. As well as adverting to the importance of collective reflexivity to learning, the study highlights scope for dissonance between the modes of reflexivity and practices favoured by an online learning environment and the reflexive profile of the student.

AB - It is important to develop understanding of what underpins the engagement of students in online learning environments. This article reports on a multiple case study that explored student engagement in a set of postgraduate degrees offered on a fully online basis. The study was based on a theorization of student engagement as the exercise of intentional human action,.or agency. It identified ways in which tasks and social relations in the online learning environments triggered reflexivity on the part of students, with ‘reflexivity’ understood to mean the ordinary mental capacity to consider oneself in relation to one’s social setting. A different relationship between reflexivity and student engagement was in view than that identified by Margaret Archer with regard to reflexivity and social mobility. Rather than displaying one dominant mode of reflexivity, the students considered in the study were seen to draw on a range of modes. The engagement of these students in their learning was also seen to depend on the manner in which they engaged in reflexivity centred on the pursuit of shared goals, that is in collective reflexivity. Specific practices were seen to trigger constructive forms of collective reflexivity, while fractured and restricted forms of collective reflexivity were linked to student disengagement in relation to joint tasks. As well as adverting to the importance of collective reflexivity to learning, the study highlights scope for dissonance between the modes of reflexivity and practices favoured by an online learning environment and the reflexive profile of the student.

KW - Collective reflexivity

KW - Online learning

KW - Realist social theory

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Student engagement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988648815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z

DO - 10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 203

EP - 218

JO - Educational Technology Research and Development

JF - Educational Technology Research and Development

SN - 1042-1629

IS - 1

ER -