Understanding the Determinants of RiskMetrics/ISS Ratings of the Quality of UK Companies' Corporate Governance Practice

Khaled Hussainey , Basil Al-Najjar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the determinants of RiskMetrics/ISS Ratings of the quality of UK companies' corporate governance practice and investigate whether corporate governance mechanisms and firm specific characteristics affect these ratings. We also investigate the association between firms' financial distress and these ratings. Using data for nonfinancial Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 250 firms over the 2003 to 2009 period, we find that board independence, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, firm size, and profitability are associated with firms' corporate governance ratings. In addition, we find that more independent directors on the board, more institutional ownership, and larger size lead to a high level of board-related ratings. Finally, we find no association between corporate governance ratings and financial distress.
LanguageEnglish
Pages366-377
Number of pages12
JournalCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Volume29
Issue number4
Early online date21 Nov 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

corporate governance
Profitability
rating
determinants
firm
Industry
stock exchange
profitability
Rating
Corporate governance
director

Cite this

@article{e46e7c2eb1ed42f7bbae3dfda9a89961,
title = "Understanding the Determinants of RiskMetrics/ISS Ratings of the Quality of UK Companies' Corporate Governance Practice",
abstract = "We examine the determinants of RiskMetrics/ISS Ratings of the quality of UK companies' corporate governance practice and investigate whether corporate governance mechanisms and firm specific characteristics affect these ratings. We also investigate the association between firms' financial distress and these ratings. Using data for nonfinancial Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 250 firms over the 2003 to 2009 period, we find that board independence, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, firm size, and profitability are associated with firms' corporate governance ratings. In addition, we find that more independent directors on the board, more institutional ownership, and larger size lead to a high level of board-related ratings. Finally, we find no association between corporate governance ratings and financial distress.",
keywords = "corporate governance ratings, corporate governance mechanisms, firm-specific characteristics, financial distress, UK",
author = "Khaled Hussainey and Basil Al-Najjar",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1002/cjas.1227",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "366--377",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences",
issn = "0825-0383",
publisher = "Dalhousie University Press, Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the Determinants of RiskMetrics/ISS Ratings of the Quality of UK Companies' Corporate Governance Practice

AU - Hussainey , Khaled

AU - Al-Najjar, Basil

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - We examine the determinants of RiskMetrics/ISS Ratings of the quality of UK companies' corporate governance practice and investigate whether corporate governance mechanisms and firm specific characteristics affect these ratings. We also investigate the association between firms' financial distress and these ratings. Using data for nonfinancial Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 250 firms over the 2003 to 2009 period, we find that board independence, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, firm size, and profitability are associated with firms' corporate governance ratings. In addition, we find that more independent directors on the board, more institutional ownership, and larger size lead to a high level of board-related ratings. Finally, we find no association between corporate governance ratings and financial distress.

AB - We examine the determinants of RiskMetrics/ISS Ratings of the quality of UK companies' corporate governance practice and investigate whether corporate governance mechanisms and firm specific characteristics affect these ratings. We also investigate the association between firms' financial distress and these ratings. Using data for nonfinancial Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 250 firms over the 2003 to 2009 period, we find that board independence, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, firm size, and profitability are associated with firms' corporate governance ratings. In addition, we find that more independent directors on the board, more institutional ownership, and larger size lead to a high level of board-related ratings. Finally, we find no association between corporate governance ratings and financial distress.

KW - corporate governance ratings

KW - corporate governance mechanisms

KW - firm-specific characteristics

KW - financial distress

KW - UK

U2 - 10.1002/cjas.1227

DO - 10.1002/cjas.1227

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 366

EP - 377

JO - Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

T2 - Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

JF - Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

SN - 0825-0383

IS - 4

ER -