Undulating Grounds, Undisciplined Bodies

The Soviet Rationalists and the Kinaesthesis of revolutionary crowds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In the turbulent political conditions of early modernity, the urban mass crowd emerged as a social phenomenon which presented demanding challenges to the arts: to innovate spatial formulations, graphic compositions and even aesthetic principles drawing on this new collectivity for legitimacy. Comparing the work of the Soviet Rationalist architects to the theatrical methods and productions by the Soviet revolutionary director V. E. Meyerhold, this paper probes the arts’ responses to this crowd design problem. It discerns a spatial logic of ground-and-body: designers shaped theatrical sets and building surfaces to choreograph group ensembles as events, and to forge an alternative conception of space from the varying intensities of kinaesthetic bodily rhythms. Accordingly, the paper reflects on the nature of collective consciousness thereby evoked, and its distinct difference from another modernist state of consciousness: the paranoid individualism of panoptic inspection. It ventures to speculate that the Rationalists’ architecture (and Meyerhold’s theatre) effectively restores inter-subjectivity from its idealist discourse as an inquiry into other minds, to aproblem of other bodies where subjectivity unfolds between emotional states at the body’s expressive surface: the domain of generative spatial-design.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-617
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Architecture
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Theaters
Inspection
Chemical analysis
Kinesthesis
Revolution
Crowds
Rationalist
Art
Expressive
Generative
Modernist
Early Modernity
Social Phenomena
Emotional State
Forge
Other Minds
Legitimacy
Consciousness
Subjectivity
Idealist

Cite this

@article{aca2ec7cdd7e4409a9a738e7c5ed2a32,
title = "Undulating Grounds, Undisciplined Bodies: The Soviet Rationalists and the Kinaesthesis of revolutionary crowds",
abstract = "In the turbulent political conditions of early modernity, the urban mass crowd emerged as a social phenomenon which presented demanding challenges to the arts: to innovate spatial formulations, graphic compositions and even aesthetic principles drawing on this new collectivity for legitimacy. Comparing the work of the Soviet Rationalist architects to the theatrical methods and productions by the Soviet revolutionary director V. E. Meyerhold, this paper probes the arts’ responses to this crowd design problem. It discerns a spatial logic of ground-and-body: designers shaped theatrical sets and building surfaces to choreograph group ensembles as events, and to forge an alternative conception of space from the varying intensities of kinaesthetic bodily rhythms. Accordingly, the paper reflects on the nature of collective consciousness thereby evoked, and its distinct difference from another modernist state of consciousness: the paranoid individualism of panoptic inspection. It ventures to speculate that the Rationalists’ architecture (and Meyerhold’s theatre) effectively restores inter-subjectivity from its idealist discourse as an inquiry into other minds, to aproblem of other bodies where subjectivity unfolds between emotional states at the body’s expressive surface: the domain of generative spatial-design.",
author = "Hazem Ziada",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/13602365.2013.809372",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "591--617",
journal = "Journal of Architecture",
issn = "1360-2365",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Undulating Grounds, Undisciplined Bodies : The Soviet Rationalists and the Kinaesthesis of revolutionary crowds. / Ziada, Hazem.

In: Journal of Architecture, Vol. 18, No. 4, 08.2013, p. 591-617.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Undulating Grounds, Undisciplined Bodies

T2 - The Soviet Rationalists and the Kinaesthesis of revolutionary crowds

AU - Ziada, Hazem

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - In the turbulent political conditions of early modernity, the urban mass crowd emerged as a social phenomenon which presented demanding challenges to the arts: to innovate spatial formulations, graphic compositions and even aesthetic principles drawing on this new collectivity for legitimacy. Comparing the work of the Soviet Rationalist architects to the theatrical methods and productions by the Soviet revolutionary director V. E. Meyerhold, this paper probes the arts’ responses to this crowd design problem. It discerns a spatial logic of ground-and-body: designers shaped theatrical sets and building surfaces to choreograph group ensembles as events, and to forge an alternative conception of space from the varying intensities of kinaesthetic bodily rhythms. Accordingly, the paper reflects on the nature of collective consciousness thereby evoked, and its distinct difference from another modernist state of consciousness: the paranoid individualism of panoptic inspection. It ventures to speculate that the Rationalists’ architecture (and Meyerhold’s theatre) effectively restores inter-subjectivity from its idealist discourse as an inquiry into other minds, to aproblem of other bodies where subjectivity unfolds between emotional states at the body’s expressive surface: the domain of generative spatial-design.

AB - In the turbulent political conditions of early modernity, the urban mass crowd emerged as a social phenomenon which presented demanding challenges to the arts: to innovate spatial formulations, graphic compositions and even aesthetic principles drawing on this new collectivity for legitimacy. Comparing the work of the Soviet Rationalist architects to the theatrical methods and productions by the Soviet revolutionary director V. E. Meyerhold, this paper probes the arts’ responses to this crowd design problem. It discerns a spatial logic of ground-and-body: designers shaped theatrical sets and building surfaces to choreograph group ensembles as events, and to forge an alternative conception of space from the varying intensities of kinaesthetic bodily rhythms. Accordingly, the paper reflects on the nature of collective consciousness thereby evoked, and its distinct difference from another modernist state of consciousness: the paranoid individualism of panoptic inspection. It ventures to speculate that the Rationalists’ architecture (and Meyerhold’s theatre) effectively restores inter-subjectivity from its idealist discourse as an inquiry into other minds, to aproblem of other bodies where subjectivity unfolds between emotional states at the body’s expressive surface: the domain of generative spatial-design.

U2 - 10.1080/13602365.2013.809372

DO - 10.1080/13602365.2013.809372

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 591

EP - 617

JO - Journal of Architecture

JF - Journal of Architecture

SN - 1360-2365

IS - 4

ER -