University R&D and firm productivity: Evidence from Italy

Giuseppe Medda, Claudio Piga, Donald S. Siegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ed Mansfield wrote several papers on the private returns to basic research (e.g. Mansfield, 1980) and the influence of academic research on industrial innovation (e.g. Mansfield, 1991). We extend this line of research by assessing the impact of university research on total factor productivity growth of Italian manufacturing firms. The econometric analysis is based on reduced-form estimation of the R&D capital stock model, including controls for two potential sources of sample selection bias, as proposed by Crepon et al (1998) and Piga and Vivarelli (2004). Our results suggest that while there are positive returns to collaborative research with other firms, collaborative research with universities does not appear to directly stimulate productivity. We interpret this result as consistent with recent evidence (e.g. Hall et al 2001, 2003) suggesting that firms engage in collaborative research with universities when appropriability conditions are weak.

LanguageEnglish
Pages199-205
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Technology Transfer
Volume30
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Productivity
Italy
Collaborative research
Firm productivity
Innovation
Reduced form
Sample selection bias
Industrial innovation
Manufacturing firms
Basic research
Academic research
Capital stock
Econometric analysis
Total factor productivity growth
Appropriability
University research

Cite this

Medda, Giuseppe ; Piga, Claudio ; Siegel, Donald S. / University R&D and firm productivity : Evidence from Italy. In: Journal of Technology Transfer. 2004 ; Vol. 30, No. 1-2. pp. 199-205.
@article{b838348db4af4eac9c718ea6af964b9a,
title = "University R&D and firm productivity: Evidence from Italy",
abstract = "Ed Mansfield wrote several papers on the private returns to basic research (e.g. Mansfield, 1980) and the influence of academic research on industrial innovation (e.g. Mansfield, 1991). We extend this line of research by assessing the impact of university research on total factor productivity growth of Italian manufacturing firms. The econometric analysis is based on reduced-form estimation of the R&D capital stock model, including controls for two potential sources of sample selection bias, as proposed by Crepon et al (1998) and Piga and Vivarelli (2004). Our results suggest that while there are positive returns to collaborative research with other firms, collaborative research with universities does not appear to directly stimulate productivity. We interpret this result as consistent with recent evidence (e.g. Hall et al 2001, 2003) suggesting that firms engage in collaborative research with universities when appropriability conditions are weak.",
keywords = "Sample selection bias, Total factor productivity, University R&D",
author = "Giuseppe Medda and Claudio Piga and Siegel, {Donald S.}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10961-004-4366-7",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "199--205",
journal = "Journal of Technology Transfer",
issn = "0892-9912",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "1-2",

}

University R&D and firm productivity : Evidence from Italy. / Medda, Giuseppe; Piga, Claudio; Siegel, Donald S.

In: Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 30, No. 1-2, 01.12.2004, p. 199-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - University R&D and firm productivity

T2 - Journal of Technology Transfer

AU - Medda, Giuseppe

AU - Piga, Claudio

AU - Siegel, Donald S.

PY - 2004/12/1

Y1 - 2004/12/1

N2 - Ed Mansfield wrote several papers on the private returns to basic research (e.g. Mansfield, 1980) and the influence of academic research on industrial innovation (e.g. Mansfield, 1991). We extend this line of research by assessing the impact of university research on total factor productivity growth of Italian manufacturing firms. The econometric analysis is based on reduced-form estimation of the R&D capital stock model, including controls for two potential sources of sample selection bias, as proposed by Crepon et al (1998) and Piga and Vivarelli (2004). Our results suggest that while there are positive returns to collaborative research with other firms, collaborative research with universities does not appear to directly stimulate productivity. We interpret this result as consistent with recent evidence (e.g. Hall et al 2001, 2003) suggesting that firms engage in collaborative research with universities when appropriability conditions are weak.

AB - Ed Mansfield wrote several papers on the private returns to basic research (e.g. Mansfield, 1980) and the influence of academic research on industrial innovation (e.g. Mansfield, 1991). We extend this line of research by assessing the impact of university research on total factor productivity growth of Italian manufacturing firms. The econometric analysis is based on reduced-form estimation of the R&D capital stock model, including controls for two potential sources of sample selection bias, as proposed by Crepon et al (1998) and Piga and Vivarelli (2004). Our results suggest that while there are positive returns to collaborative research with other firms, collaborative research with universities does not appear to directly stimulate productivity. We interpret this result as consistent with recent evidence (e.g. Hall et al 2001, 2003) suggesting that firms engage in collaborative research with universities when appropriability conditions are weak.

KW - Sample selection bias

KW - Total factor productivity

KW - University R&D

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147147218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10961-004-4366-7

DO - 10.1007/s10961-004-4366-7

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 199

EP - 205

JO - Journal of Technology Transfer

JF - Journal of Technology Transfer

SN - 0892-9912

IS - 1-2

ER -