Unpacking the problem of research access(es): The case of large knowledge-intensive international consultancies

Mira Karjalainen, Charlotta Niemistö, Jeffery Hearn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to unpack the question of research access(es), especially ethnographic access, seen as an intrinsic part of research projects that should be scrutinized carefully to gain a deeper understanding of the field. Two main questions are asked: what does the process of accessing knowledge-intensive businesses (KIBs), specifically large international consultancies (LICs), tell us about access more generally? And what does accessing KIBs, specifically LICs, tell us about these organizations more generally?

Design/methodology/approach
– The paper builds on discussions of research access issues in organizational ethnography, in part when setting out to employ shadowing as a method of inquiry. It focuses on the challenges of gaining access to KIBs, where confidentiality is central to the work. The empirical focus is a study of LICs from where the data for this paper is drawn.

Findings
– To answer the two questions, the paper provides an analysis of: accesses in the plural; ongoing processes of accessing; multiple levels of access and contradictory negotiations; research accesses, including access difficulties, as constitutive of research itself; and research accesses as dependent on and giving data on the organizations in question. Building on literatures on ethnographic access and empirical data gained while negotiating access to LICs, this paper contributes to prior research on access, focusing on LICs as an arena for organizational ethnography, whose particular character has to be taken into account when conducting research.

Originality/value
– This paper examines the processes of accessing, a neglected but important part of research: the phase(s) of negotiating and gaining access to the field, and the need to fully absorb these phases into the research process as a whole. Access as such multi-level ongoing processes is often neglected, however, in both academic writing and importantly in doctoral education curricula. Therefore, the paper offers guidelines for use in research training.
LanguageEnglish
Pages274-293
Number of pages20
JournalQualitative Research in Organizations and Management
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Sep 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Consultancy
Organizational ethnography
Negotiating
Design methodology
Confidentiality
Education
Curriculum
Intrinsic
Empirical data
Process research

Cite this

@article{7ee2fcfa8ad9487884896b5256e04043,
title = "Unpacking the problem of research access(es): The case of large knowledge-intensive international consultancies",
abstract = "Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to unpack the question of research access(es), especially ethnographic access, seen as an intrinsic part of research projects that should be scrutinized carefully to gain a deeper understanding of the field. Two main questions are asked: what does the process of accessing knowledge-intensive businesses (KIBs), specifically large international consultancies (LICs), tell us about access more generally? And what does accessing KIBs, specifically LICs, tell us about these organizations more generally?Design/methodology/approach– The paper builds on discussions of research access issues in organizational ethnography, in part when setting out to employ shadowing as a method of inquiry. It focuses on the challenges of gaining access to KIBs, where confidentiality is central to the work. The empirical focus is a study of LICs from where the data for this paper is drawn.Findings– To answer the two questions, the paper provides an analysis of: accesses in the plural; ongoing processes of accessing; multiple levels of access and contradictory negotiations; research accesses, including access difficulties, as constitutive of research itself; and research accesses as dependent on and giving data on the organizations in question. Building on literatures on ethnographic access and empirical data gained while negotiating access to LICs, this paper contributes to prior research on access, focusing on LICs as an arena for organizational ethnography, whose particular character has to be taken into account when conducting research.Originality/value– This paper examines the processes of accessing, a neglected but important part of research: the phase(s) of negotiating and gaining access to the field, and the need to fully absorb these phases into the research process as a whole. Access as such multi-level ongoing processes is often neglected, however, in both academic writing and importantly in doctoral education curricula. Therefore, the paper offers guidelines for use in research training.",
keywords = "Boundaries, Ethnography, Access, Knowledge work, Interviewing, Knowledge-intensive businesses",
author = "Mira Karjalainen and Charlotta Niemist{\"o} and Jeffery Hearn",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1108/QROM-12-2013-1189",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "274--293",
journal = "Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management",
issn = "1746-5648",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Unpacking the problem of research access(es) : The case of large knowledge-intensive international consultancies. / Karjalainen, Mira; Niemistö, Charlotta; Hearn, Jeffery.

In: Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, Vol. 10, No. 3, 14.09.2015, p. 274-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking the problem of research access(es)

T2 - Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management

AU - Karjalainen, Mira

AU - Niemistö, Charlotta

AU - Hearn, Jeffery

PY - 2015/9/14

Y1 - 2015/9/14

N2 - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to unpack the question of research access(es), especially ethnographic access, seen as an intrinsic part of research projects that should be scrutinized carefully to gain a deeper understanding of the field. Two main questions are asked: what does the process of accessing knowledge-intensive businesses (KIBs), specifically large international consultancies (LICs), tell us about access more generally? And what does accessing KIBs, specifically LICs, tell us about these organizations more generally?Design/methodology/approach– The paper builds on discussions of research access issues in organizational ethnography, in part when setting out to employ shadowing as a method of inquiry. It focuses on the challenges of gaining access to KIBs, where confidentiality is central to the work. The empirical focus is a study of LICs from where the data for this paper is drawn.Findings– To answer the two questions, the paper provides an analysis of: accesses in the plural; ongoing processes of accessing; multiple levels of access and contradictory negotiations; research accesses, including access difficulties, as constitutive of research itself; and research accesses as dependent on and giving data on the organizations in question. Building on literatures on ethnographic access and empirical data gained while negotiating access to LICs, this paper contributes to prior research on access, focusing on LICs as an arena for organizational ethnography, whose particular character has to be taken into account when conducting research.Originality/value– This paper examines the processes of accessing, a neglected but important part of research: the phase(s) of negotiating and gaining access to the field, and the need to fully absorb these phases into the research process as a whole. Access as such multi-level ongoing processes is often neglected, however, in both academic writing and importantly in doctoral education curricula. Therefore, the paper offers guidelines for use in research training.

AB - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to unpack the question of research access(es), especially ethnographic access, seen as an intrinsic part of research projects that should be scrutinized carefully to gain a deeper understanding of the field. Two main questions are asked: what does the process of accessing knowledge-intensive businesses (KIBs), specifically large international consultancies (LICs), tell us about access more generally? And what does accessing KIBs, specifically LICs, tell us about these organizations more generally?Design/methodology/approach– The paper builds on discussions of research access issues in organizational ethnography, in part when setting out to employ shadowing as a method of inquiry. It focuses on the challenges of gaining access to KIBs, where confidentiality is central to the work. The empirical focus is a study of LICs from where the data for this paper is drawn.Findings– To answer the two questions, the paper provides an analysis of: accesses in the plural; ongoing processes of accessing; multiple levels of access and contradictory negotiations; research accesses, including access difficulties, as constitutive of research itself; and research accesses as dependent on and giving data on the organizations in question. Building on literatures on ethnographic access and empirical data gained while negotiating access to LICs, this paper contributes to prior research on access, focusing on LICs as an arena for organizational ethnography, whose particular character has to be taken into account when conducting research.Originality/value– This paper examines the processes of accessing, a neglected but important part of research: the phase(s) of negotiating and gaining access to the field, and the need to fully absorb these phases into the research process as a whole. Access as such multi-level ongoing processes is often neglected, however, in both academic writing and importantly in doctoral education curricula. Therefore, the paper offers guidelines for use in research training.

KW - Boundaries

KW - Ethnography

KW - Access

KW - Knowledge work

KW - Interviewing

KW - Knowledge-intensive businesses

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/qrom

U2 - 10.1108/QROM-12-2013-1189

DO - 10.1108/QROM-12-2013-1189

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 274

EP - 293

JO - Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management

JF - Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management

SN - 1746-5648

IS - 3

ER -