Using Laugh Responses to Defuse Complaints

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research uses conversation analysis to explore a collection of extracts from telephone calls involving laughter as a response in a sequence characterized by complaining. In these instances, the laugh responses fail to align with the complaint in progress and are somewhat disaffiliative (in that they do not display the same stance as that taken by the complainant). However, they do not strongly disaffiliate; they do not, for example, overtly disagree with complaint-relevant assessments produced in prior turns. In this way, recipients of a complaint work to display a somewhat discordant stance to that of the teller, and to discourage further development of the topic in progress while maintaining social solidarity. Thus, the current research adds to the finding (see also Drew, 1987, and Jefferson, Sacks, & Schegloff, 1987) that laughter can be located somewhere in the middle of a continuum ranging from overt affiliation to disaffiliation (Glenn, 2003, ch. 6).

LanguageEnglish
Pages430-448
Number of pages19
JournalResearch on Language and Social Interaction
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Laughter
complaint
humor
Telephone
Research
conversation analysis
solidarity
telephone
recipient

Cite this

@article{069a6182eafd403d854cc9f350f80adf,
title = "Using Laugh Responses to Defuse Complaints",
abstract = "This research uses conversation analysis to explore a collection of extracts from telephone calls involving laughter as a response in a sequence characterized by complaining. In these instances, the laugh responses fail to align with the complaint in progress and are somewhat disaffiliative (in that they do not display the same stance as that taken by the complainant). However, they do not strongly disaffiliate; they do not, for example, overtly disagree with complaint-relevant assessments produced in prior turns. In this way, recipients of a complaint work to display a somewhat discordant stance to that of the teller, and to discourage further development of the topic in progress while maintaining social solidarity. Thus, the current research adds to the finding (see also Drew, 1987, and Jefferson, Sacks, & Schegloff, 1987) that laughter can be located somewhere in the middle of a continuum ranging from overt affiliation to disaffiliation (Glenn, 2003, ch. 6).",
author = "Liz Holt",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/08351813.2012.726886",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "430--448",
journal = "Research on Language and Social Interaction",
issn = "0835-1813",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Using Laugh Responses to Defuse Complaints. / Holt, Liz.

In: Research on Language and Social Interaction, Vol. 45, No. 4, 10.2012, p. 430-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Laugh Responses to Defuse Complaints

AU - Holt, Liz

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - This research uses conversation analysis to explore a collection of extracts from telephone calls involving laughter as a response in a sequence characterized by complaining. In these instances, the laugh responses fail to align with the complaint in progress and are somewhat disaffiliative (in that they do not display the same stance as that taken by the complainant). However, they do not strongly disaffiliate; they do not, for example, overtly disagree with complaint-relevant assessments produced in prior turns. In this way, recipients of a complaint work to display a somewhat discordant stance to that of the teller, and to discourage further development of the topic in progress while maintaining social solidarity. Thus, the current research adds to the finding (see also Drew, 1987, and Jefferson, Sacks, & Schegloff, 1987) that laughter can be located somewhere in the middle of a continuum ranging from overt affiliation to disaffiliation (Glenn, 2003, ch. 6).

AB - This research uses conversation analysis to explore a collection of extracts from telephone calls involving laughter as a response in a sequence characterized by complaining. In these instances, the laugh responses fail to align with the complaint in progress and are somewhat disaffiliative (in that they do not display the same stance as that taken by the complainant). However, they do not strongly disaffiliate; they do not, for example, overtly disagree with complaint-relevant assessments produced in prior turns. In this way, recipients of a complaint work to display a somewhat discordant stance to that of the teller, and to discourage further development of the topic in progress while maintaining social solidarity. Thus, the current research adds to the finding (see also Drew, 1987, and Jefferson, Sacks, & Schegloff, 1987) that laughter can be located somewhere in the middle of a continuum ranging from overt affiliation to disaffiliation (Glenn, 2003, ch. 6).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869391053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08351813.2012.726886

DO - 10.1080/08351813.2012.726886

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 430

EP - 448

JO - Research on Language and Social Interaction

T2 - Research on Language and Social Interaction

JF - Research on Language and Social Interaction

SN - 0835-1813

IS - 4

ER -