Using ‘teacher talk’ to reimagine FE-based research as a basis for teaching, learning and assessment

David Powell, Sam Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Abstract

This think-piece paper is an open letter addressed to further education (FE)-based practitioners interested in research, their managers, the sector’s policy makers, and organisations like the Education and Training Foundation, who support the sector and wish to make it ‘research-rich’. Its purpose is to amplify the voices of 22 participants who attended the working group on research and scholarship at Reimagine FE18. Using Hardy’s (2010) concept of ‘teacher talk’ as a data collection method and stimulus for a series of praxis-oriented ‘conversations’, the participants identified four principles and four conditions to move forward FE-based research. First, the research needs to be led and done by FE-based practitioners; second, practitioners need to be supported to acquire the confidence to disseminate their research and new avenues identified for publishing it; third, the research needs to be rigorous and critical, and the fourth underpinning these is research, and its researchers need to be valued by the sector and its stakeholders. Conclusions are drawn and praxis, ‘morally-committed’, ‘history-making’ action in the spirit of Mahon et al., is suggested as a way forward. As such, this paper adds to the debate started 22 years ago by Elliott (1996) about why FE-based research still remains largely invisible within and beyond the sector and offers the sector’s latest response to the British Educational Research Association’s call for FE to be a ‘research-rich’ environment. In doing so, it invites managers and policy makers to begin a genuinely sincere, democratic conversation with FE-based practitioners about how to make this happen.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalJournal for the Centre of Studies in Practice and Culture in Education
Volume2
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 22 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

further education
Teaching
teacher
learning
conversation
manager
data collection method
working group
educational research
stimulus
confidence
stakeholder

Cite this

@article{d4b15719c0b248e189a2a27097efcacb,
title = "Using ‘teacher talk’ to reimagine FE-based research as a basis for teaching, learning and assessment",
abstract = "This think-piece paper is an open letter addressed to further education (FE)-based practitioners interested in research, their managers, the sector’s policy makers, and organisations like the Education and Training Foundation, who support the sector and wish to make it ‘research-rich’. Its purpose is to amplify the voices of 22 participants who attended the working group on research and scholarship at Reimagine FE18. Using Hardy’s (2010) concept of ‘teacher talk’ as a data collection method and stimulus for a series of praxis-oriented ‘conversations’, the participants identified four principles and four conditions to move forward FE-based research. First, the research needs to be led and done by FE-based practitioners; second, practitioners need to be supported to acquire the confidence to disseminate their research and new avenues identified for publishing it; third, the research needs to be rigorous and critical, and the fourth underpinning these is research, and its researchers need to be valued by the sector and its stakeholders. Conclusions are drawn and praxis, ‘morally-committed’, ‘history-making’ action in the spirit of Mahon et al., is suggested as a way forward. As such, this paper adds to the debate started 22 years ago by Elliott (1996) about why FE-based research still remains largely invisible within and beyond the sector and offers the sector’s latest response to the British Educational Research Association’s call for FE to be a ‘research-rich’ environment. In doing so, it invites managers and policy makers to begin a genuinely sincere, democratic conversation with FE-based practitioners about how to make this happen.",
keywords = "FE-based research, research-rich, teacher-talk, praxis",
author = "David Powell and Sam Jones",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "22",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Journal for the Centre of Studies in Practice and Culture in Education",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using ‘teacher talk’ to reimagine FE-based research as a basis for teaching, learning and assessment

AU - Powell, David

AU - Jones, Sam

PY - 2019/2/22

Y1 - 2019/2/22

N2 - This think-piece paper is an open letter addressed to further education (FE)-based practitioners interested in research, their managers, the sector’s policy makers, and organisations like the Education and Training Foundation, who support the sector and wish to make it ‘research-rich’. Its purpose is to amplify the voices of 22 participants who attended the working group on research and scholarship at Reimagine FE18. Using Hardy’s (2010) concept of ‘teacher talk’ as a data collection method and stimulus for a series of praxis-oriented ‘conversations’, the participants identified four principles and four conditions to move forward FE-based research. First, the research needs to be led and done by FE-based practitioners; second, practitioners need to be supported to acquire the confidence to disseminate their research and new avenues identified for publishing it; third, the research needs to be rigorous and critical, and the fourth underpinning these is research, and its researchers need to be valued by the sector and its stakeholders. Conclusions are drawn and praxis, ‘morally-committed’, ‘history-making’ action in the spirit of Mahon et al., is suggested as a way forward. As such, this paper adds to the debate started 22 years ago by Elliott (1996) about why FE-based research still remains largely invisible within and beyond the sector and offers the sector’s latest response to the British Educational Research Association’s call for FE to be a ‘research-rich’ environment. In doing so, it invites managers and policy makers to begin a genuinely sincere, democratic conversation with FE-based practitioners about how to make this happen.

AB - This think-piece paper is an open letter addressed to further education (FE)-based practitioners interested in research, their managers, the sector’s policy makers, and organisations like the Education and Training Foundation, who support the sector and wish to make it ‘research-rich’. Its purpose is to amplify the voices of 22 participants who attended the working group on research and scholarship at Reimagine FE18. Using Hardy’s (2010) concept of ‘teacher talk’ as a data collection method and stimulus for a series of praxis-oriented ‘conversations’, the participants identified four principles and four conditions to move forward FE-based research. First, the research needs to be led and done by FE-based practitioners; second, practitioners need to be supported to acquire the confidence to disseminate their research and new avenues identified for publishing it; third, the research needs to be rigorous and critical, and the fourth underpinning these is research, and its researchers need to be valued by the sector and its stakeholders. Conclusions are drawn and praxis, ‘morally-committed’, ‘history-making’ action in the spirit of Mahon et al., is suggested as a way forward. As such, this paper adds to the debate started 22 years ago by Elliott (1996) about why FE-based research still remains largely invisible within and beyond the sector and offers the sector’s latest response to the British Educational Research Association’s call for FE to be a ‘research-rich’ environment. In doing so, it invites managers and policy makers to begin a genuinely sincere, democratic conversation with FE-based practitioners about how to make this happen.

KW - FE-based research

KW - research-rich

KW - teacher-talk

KW - praxis

M3 - Letter

VL - 2

JO - Journal for the Centre of Studies in Practice and Culture in Education

T2 - Journal for the Centre of Studies in Practice and Culture in Education

JF - Journal for the Centre of Studies in Practice and Culture in Education

IS - 1

ER -