Variation in Lumbar Sagittal Mobility with Low-Back Trouble

A. K. Burton, K. M. Tillotson, J. D.G. Troup

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The influence of low-back trouble on lumbar sagittal mobility was explored In 958 Individuals aged 10 to 84 years. Experience of low-back trouble was determined by questionnaire, and categorized as none, a previous history, or a current spell. Maximal mobility was estimated from flexlcurve records of back surface curvature. The results for adults revealed that mean mobility values were reduced by both previous and current low-back trouble, particularly in the upper lumbar region, when compared with nonsufferers. Stepwise regression analyses showed that variation in mobility was best accounted for by the cumulative effects of age and sex. These variables accounted for approximately one-third of the variation In mobility: low-back trouble only accounted for an additional 1%. At the extremes of the range, both hypomoblllty and hypermobility were Identified as risk Indicators for low-back trouble. Relative hypermobllity was not confined to subjects with no history of back trouble; some current sufferers had particularly high levels of mobility. Similarly hypomobillty was found In nonsufferers as well as in those with back trouble. The data Indicated that young adults (notably males) with previous low-back trouble may not recover their previous mobility on symptomatic resolution. The finding of hypermobility In current sufferers indicates that mobilization therapy may not be appropriate for such patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)584-590
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 1989

Fingerprint

Lumbosacral Region
Young Adult
Regression Analysis
Therapeutics
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Burton, A. K. ; Tillotson, K. M. ; Troup, J. D.G. / Variation in Lumbar Sagittal Mobility with Low-Back Trouble. In: Spine. 1989 ; Vol. 14, No. 6. pp. 584-590.
@article{853c545094b349e3890c494f4c3a7ba9,
title = "Variation in Lumbar Sagittal Mobility with Low-Back Trouble",
abstract = "The influence of low-back trouble on lumbar sagittal mobility was explored In 958 Individuals aged 10 to 84 years. Experience of low-back trouble was determined by questionnaire, and categorized as none, a previous history, or a current spell. Maximal mobility was estimated from flexlcurve records of back surface curvature. The results for adults revealed that mean mobility values were reduced by both previous and current low-back trouble, particularly in the upper lumbar region, when compared with nonsufferers. Stepwise regression analyses showed that variation in mobility was best accounted for by the cumulative effects of age and sex. These variables accounted for approximately one-third of the variation In mobility: low-back trouble only accounted for an additional 1{\%}. At the extremes of the range, both hypomoblllty and hypermobility were Identified as risk Indicators for low-back trouble. Relative hypermobllity was not confined to subjects with no history of back trouble; some current sufferers had particularly high levels of mobility. Similarly hypomobillty was found In nonsufferers as well as in those with back trouble. The data Indicated that young adults (notably males) with previous low-back trouble may not recover their previous mobility on symptomatic resolution. The finding of hypermobility In current sufferers indicates that mobilization therapy may not be appropriate for such patients.",
keywords = "Back pain, Hypermobllity, Hypomobillty, Lumbar sagittal mobility, Lumbar spine, Measurement",
author = "Burton, {A. K.} and Tillotson, {K. M.} and Troup, {J. D.G.}",
year = "1989",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-198906000-00007",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "584--590",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

Variation in Lumbar Sagittal Mobility with Low-Back Trouble. / Burton, A. K.; Tillotson, K. M.; Troup, J. D.G.

In: Spine, Vol. 14, No. 6, 01.06.1989, p. 584-590.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in Lumbar Sagittal Mobility with Low-Back Trouble

AU - Burton, A. K.

AU - Tillotson, K. M.

AU - Troup, J. D.G.

PY - 1989/6/1

Y1 - 1989/6/1

N2 - The influence of low-back trouble on lumbar sagittal mobility was explored In 958 Individuals aged 10 to 84 years. Experience of low-back trouble was determined by questionnaire, and categorized as none, a previous history, or a current spell. Maximal mobility was estimated from flexlcurve records of back surface curvature. The results for adults revealed that mean mobility values were reduced by both previous and current low-back trouble, particularly in the upper lumbar region, when compared with nonsufferers. Stepwise regression analyses showed that variation in mobility was best accounted for by the cumulative effects of age and sex. These variables accounted for approximately one-third of the variation In mobility: low-back trouble only accounted for an additional 1%. At the extremes of the range, both hypomoblllty and hypermobility were Identified as risk Indicators for low-back trouble. Relative hypermobllity was not confined to subjects with no history of back trouble; some current sufferers had particularly high levels of mobility. Similarly hypomobillty was found In nonsufferers as well as in those with back trouble. The data Indicated that young adults (notably males) with previous low-back trouble may not recover their previous mobility on symptomatic resolution. The finding of hypermobility In current sufferers indicates that mobilization therapy may not be appropriate for such patients.

AB - The influence of low-back trouble on lumbar sagittal mobility was explored In 958 Individuals aged 10 to 84 years. Experience of low-back trouble was determined by questionnaire, and categorized as none, a previous history, or a current spell. Maximal mobility was estimated from flexlcurve records of back surface curvature. The results for adults revealed that mean mobility values were reduced by both previous and current low-back trouble, particularly in the upper lumbar region, when compared with nonsufferers. Stepwise regression analyses showed that variation in mobility was best accounted for by the cumulative effects of age and sex. These variables accounted for approximately one-third of the variation In mobility: low-back trouble only accounted for an additional 1%. At the extremes of the range, both hypomoblllty and hypermobility were Identified as risk Indicators for low-back trouble. Relative hypermobllity was not confined to subjects with no history of back trouble; some current sufferers had particularly high levels of mobility. Similarly hypomobillty was found In nonsufferers as well as in those with back trouble. The data Indicated that young adults (notably males) with previous low-back trouble may not recover their previous mobility on symptomatic resolution. The finding of hypermobility In current sufferers indicates that mobilization therapy may not be appropriate for such patients.

KW - Back pain

KW - Hypermobllity

KW - Hypomobillty

KW - Lumbar sagittal mobility

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024318710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-198906000-00007

DO - 10.1097/00007632-198906000-00007

M3 - Article

C2 - 2526376

AN - SCOPUS:0024318710

VL - 14

SP - 584

EP - 590

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 6

ER -