Veracity assessment

Aspects of the account, the source and the judge that influence judgements of plausibility

Magdalene Ng, Donna Youngs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Decades of deception detection research have revealed that people are poor lie detectors in general, hovering at chance level (Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M., 2006). As well as generating considerable research effort towards establishing what does actually indicate deception, this stark finding draws attention to the need to understand how people are making these (poor) judgements. This can be broken down into a series of questions about what it is about the account given that people focus on, what it is about the individuals giving the accounts and the context in which they are giving these that influences judgement processes and finally, what it is about those making the assessments that has a bearing on the way they make decisions. Understanding the issues relevant to the judgement process offers insights as to why veracity judgements are wrong as often as they are right.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-154
Number of pages20
JournalCrime Psychology Review
Volume1
Issue number1
Early online date12 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this

@article{edab597f10794791927d87ad583fa382,
title = "Veracity assessment: Aspects of the account, the source and the judge that influence judgements of plausibility",
abstract = "Decades of deception detection research have revealed that people are poor lie detectors in general, hovering at chance level (Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M., 2006). As well as generating considerable research effort towards establishing what does actually indicate deception, this stark finding draws attention to the need to understand how people are making these (poor) judgements. This can be broken down into a series of questions about what it is about the account given that people focus on, what it is about the individuals giving the accounts and the context in which they are giving these that influences judgement processes and finally, what it is about those making the assessments that has a bearing on the way they make decisions. Understanding the issues relevant to the judgement process offers insights as to why veracity judgements are wrong as often as they are right.",
keywords = "Lie detection, Deception, Accuracy, Veracity, Judgements",
author = "Magdalene Ng and Donna Youngs",
note = "Not OA compliant; No full text on Eprints HN 07/09/2017",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/23744006.2016.1177946",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "135--154",
journal = "Crime Psychology Review",
issn = "2374-4006",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Veracity assessment : Aspects of the account, the source and the judge that influence judgements of plausibility. / Ng, Magdalene; Youngs, Donna.

In: Crime Psychology Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2016, p. 135-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Veracity assessment

T2 - Aspects of the account, the source and the judge that influence judgements of plausibility

AU - Ng, Magdalene

AU - Youngs, Donna

N1 - Not OA compliant; No full text on Eprints HN 07/09/2017

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Decades of deception detection research have revealed that people are poor lie detectors in general, hovering at chance level (Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M., 2006). As well as generating considerable research effort towards establishing what does actually indicate deception, this stark finding draws attention to the need to understand how people are making these (poor) judgements. This can be broken down into a series of questions about what it is about the account given that people focus on, what it is about the individuals giving the accounts and the context in which they are giving these that influences judgement processes and finally, what it is about those making the assessments that has a bearing on the way they make decisions. Understanding the issues relevant to the judgement process offers insights as to why veracity judgements are wrong as often as they are right.

AB - Decades of deception detection research have revealed that people are poor lie detectors in general, hovering at chance level (Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M., 2006). As well as generating considerable research effort towards establishing what does actually indicate deception, this stark finding draws attention to the need to understand how people are making these (poor) judgements. This can be broken down into a series of questions about what it is about the account given that people focus on, what it is about the individuals giving the accounts and the context in which they are giving these that influences judgement processes and finally, what it is about those making the assessments that has a bearing on the way they make decisions. Understanding the issues relevant to the judgement process offers insights as to why veracity judgements are wrong as often as they are right.

KW - Lie detection

KW - Deception

KW - Accuracy

KW - Veracity

KW - Judgements

U2 - 10.1080/23744006.2016.1177946

DO - 10.1080/23744006.2016.1177946

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 135

EP - 154

JO - Crime Psychology Review

JF - Crime Psychology Review

SN - 2374-4006

IS - 1

ER -