11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As the global population continues to grow, age and urbanise, it is vital to provide accessible transport so that neither ageing nor disability constitutes barriers to social inclusion. While technology can enhance urban access, there is a need to study the ways by which transport technologies – real-time information, pedestrian navigation, surveillance and road pricing – could be more effectively adopted by users. The reason for this is that some people, and particularly vulnerable populations, are still likely to be reluctant to use (or even avoid using) technologies perceived as ‘unknown’ and ‘complicated’. On the basis of evidence from British and Swedish case studies on older people’s perceptions of the aforementioned transport technologies, as well as of a Swedish case study of visually impaired people’s perceptions, this paper makes the case that technology is only one tool in a complex sociotechnical system, and one that brings challenges. The authors also suggest that although vulnerable populations are not homogeneous when expressing their attitudes towards transport technologies, their assessment criteria tend to be ‘prosocial’ as they usually consider that the societal benefits of the assessed technologies outweigh the personal benefits. Emphasising aspects linked to the technologies’ prosocial potential or relevance to the individual user could therefore increase acceptance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)154-162
Number of pages9
JournalProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning
Volume169
Issue number3
Early online date9 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

sociotechnical system
road pricing
social inclusion
assessment criteria
technology assessment
pedestrian
disability
navigation
surveillance
pricing
acceptance
Large scale systems
inclusion
road
Navigation
Aging of materials
evidence
Costs
time

Cite this

@article{4d4223839cea4865a5bd531b3cd779d5,
title = "Vulnerable users’ perceptions of transport technologies",
abstract = "As the global population continues to grow, age and urbanise, it is vital to provide accessible transport so that neither ageing nor disability constitutes barriers to social inclusion. While technology can enhance urban access, there is a need to study the ways by which transport technologies – real-time information, pedestrian navigation, surveillance and road pricing – could be more effectively adopted by users. The reason for this is that some people, and particularly vulnerable populations, are still likely to be reluctant to use (or even avoid using) technologies perceived as ‘unknown’ and ‘complicated’. On the basis of evidence from British and Swedish case studies on older people’s perceptions of the aforementioned transport technologies, as well as of a Swedish case study of visually impaired people’s perceptions, this paper makes the case that technology is only one tool in a complex sociotechnical system, and one that brings challenges. The authors also suggest that although vulnerable populations are not homogeneous when expressing their attitudes towards transport technologies, their assessment criteria tend to be ‘prosocial’ as they usually consider that the societal benefits of the assessed technologies outweigh the personal benefits. Emphasising aspects linked to the technologies’ prosocial potential or relevance to the individual user could therefore increase acceptance.",
keywords = "Information technology, Public policy, Transport planning",
author = "Jana Sochor and Alexandros Nikitas",
note = "OA compliant; no accepted date on output or ePrints but AAM deposited in ePrints prior to publication.",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1680/jurdp.14.00054",
language = "English",
volume = "169",
pages = "154--162",
journal = "Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning",
issn = "1755-0793",
publisher = "ICE Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Vulnerable users’ perceptions of transport technologies. / Sochor, Jana; Nikitas, Alexandros.

In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning, Vol. 169, No. 3, 01.06.2016, p. 154-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vulnerable users’ perceptions of transport technologies

AU - Sochor, Jana

AU - Nikitas, Alexandros

N1 - OA compliant; no accepted date on output or ePrints but AAM deposited in ePrints prior to publication.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - As the global population continues to grow, age and urbanise, it is vital to provide accessible transport so that neither ageing nor disability constitutes barriers to social inclusion. While technology can enhance urban access, there is a need to study the ways by which transport technologies – real-time information, pedestrian navigation, surveillance and road pricing – could be more effectively adopted by users. The reason for this is that some people, and particularly vulnerable populations, are still likely to be reluctant to use (or even avoid using) technologies perceived as ‘unknown’ and ‘complicated’. On the basis of evidence from British and Swedish case studies on older people’s perceptions of the aforementioned transport technologies, as well as of a Swedish case study of visually impaired people’s perceptions, this paper makes the case that technology is only one tool in a complex sociotechnical system, and one that brings challenges. The authors also suggest that although vulnerable populations are not homogeneous when expressing their attitudes towards transport technologies, their assessment criteria tend to be ‘prosocial’ as they usually consider that the societal benefits of the assessed technologies outweigh the personal benefits. Emphasising aspects linked to the technologies’ prosocial potential or relevance to the individual user could therefore increase acceptance.

AB - As the global population continues to grow, age and urbanise, it is vital to provide accessible transport so that neither ageing nor disability constitutes barriers to social inclusion. While technology can enhance urban access, there is a need to study the ways by which transport technologies – real-time information, pedestrian navigation, surveillance and road pricing – could be more effectively adopted by users. The reason for this is that some people, and particularly vulnerable populations, are still likely to be reluctant to use (or even avoid using) technologies perceived as ‘unknown’ and ‘complicated’. On the basis of evidence from British and Swedish case studies on older people’s perceptions of the aforementioned transport technologies, as well as of a Swedish case study of visually impaired people’s perceptions, this paper makes the case that technology is only one tool in a complex sociotechnical system, and one that brings challenges. The authors also suggest that although vulnerable populations are not homogeneous when expressing their attitudes towards transport technologies, their assessment criteria tend to be ‘prosocial’ as they usually consider that the societal benefits of the assessed technologies outweigh the personal benefits. Emphasising aspects linked to the technologies’ prosocial potential or relevance to the individual user could therefore increase acceptance.

KW - Information technology

KW - Public policy

KW - Transport planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966783426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1680/jurdp.14.00054

DO - 10.1680/jurdp.14.00054

M3 - Article

VL - 169

SP - 154

EP - 162

JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning

JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning

SN - 1755-0793

IS - 3

ER -