“We don’t want to go and be idle ducks”

family practices at the end of life

Erica Borgstrom , Julie Ellis, Kate Woodthorpe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

At present, end-of-life research, policy and practice typically prioritise the dying individual and consider the family an orbiting static unit. Sociological theorising of dying has reflected this trend, focusing on the macro-level and public rather than private sphere, with sociologists engaged in the study of family and relationships overlooking the end of life altogether. In addressing this gap, this article argues that the end of life is a relational experience in which everyday family practices are embedded and enacted. Drawing on two ethnographic studies, it demonstrates some of the ways in which family is actively ‘done’ at this time, principally in the transference of family practices into institutional settings, and shared decision making. In doing so, it makes a case for moving beyond a highly individualised emphasis on the person nearing the end of their life and an accompanying normative conceptualisation of family, towards an understanding that families (in all their diversity) and their continued (un)making are central to the experience.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSociology
Early online date24 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

dying
transference
research policy
research practice
macro level
sociologist
experience
decision making
human being
present
trend
time

Cite this

@article{fb6fbec6c36e4efe9d9e9adf42705c01,
title = "“We don’t want to go and be idle ducks”: family practices at the end of life",
abstract = "At present, end-of-life research, policy and practice typically prioritise the dying individual and consider the family an orbiting static unit. Sociological theorising of dying has reflected this trend, focusing on the macro-level and public rather than private sphere, with sociologists engaged in the study of family and relationships overlooking the end of life altogether. In addressing this gap, this article argues that the end of life is a relational experience in which everyday family practices are embedded and enacted. Drawing on two ethnographic studies, it demonstrates some of the ways in which family is actively ‘done’ at this time, principally in the transference of family practices into institutional settings, and shared decision making. In doing so, it makes a case for moving beyond a highly individualised emphasis on the person nearing the end of their life and an accompanying normative conceptualisation of family, towards an understanding that families (in all their diversity) and their continued (un)making are central to the experience.",
keywords = "Dying, End of life, Ethanography, Everyday, Family, Family practice, end of life, family practice, dying, family, ethnography, everyday",
author = "Erica Borgstrom and Julie Ellis and Kate Woodthorpe",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1177/0038038519841828",
language = "English",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

“We don’t want to go and be idle ducks” : family practices at the end of life. / Borgstrom , Erica ; Ellis, Julie; Woodthorpe, Kate.

In: Sociology, 24.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - “We don’t want to go and be idle ducks”

T2 - family practices at the end of life

AU - Borgstrom , Erica

AU - Ellis, Julie

AU - Woodthorpe, Kate

PY - 2019/4/24

Y1 - 2019/4/24

N2 - At present, end-of-life research, policy and practice typically prioritise the dying individual and consider the family an orbiting static unit. Sociological theorising of dying has reflected this trend, focusing on the macro-level and public rather than private sphere, with sociologists engaged in the study of family and relationships overlooking the end of life altogether. In addressing this gap, this article argues that the end of life is a relational experience in which everyday family practices are embedded and enacted. Drawing on two ethnographic studies, it demonstrates some of the ways in which family is actively ‘done’ at this time, principally in the transference of family practices into institutional settings, and shared decision making. In doing so, it makes a case for moving beyond a highly individualised emphasis on the person nearing the end of their life and an accompanying normative conceptualisation of family, towards an understanding that families (in all their diversity) and their continued (un)making are central to the experience.

AB - At present, end-of-life research, policy and practice typically prioritise the dying individual and consider the family an orbiting static unit. Sociological theorising of dying has reflected this trend, focusing on the macro-level and public rather than private sphere, with sociologists engaged in the study of family and relationships overlooking the end of life altogether. In addressing this gap, this article argues that the end of life is a relational experience in which everyday family practices are embedded and enacted. Drawing on two ethnographic studies, it demonstrates some of the ways in which family is actively ‘done’ at this time, principally in the transference of family practices into institutional settings, and shared decision making. In doing so, it makes a case for moving beyond a highly individualised emphasis on the person nearing the end of their life and an accompanying normative conceptualisation of family, towards an understanding that families (in all their diversity) and their continued (un)making are central to the experience.

KW - Dying

KW - End of life

KW - Ethanography

KW - Everyday

KW - Family

KW - Family practice

KW - end of life

KW - family practice

KW - dying

KW - family

KW - ethnography

KW - everyday

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064940394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0038038519841828

DO - 10.1177/0038038519841828

M3 - Article

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

ER -