Welfare of the child assessments in assisted conception: A social constructionist perspective

Eric Blyth, Vivian Burr, Abigail Farrand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assisted conception services in the UK have been subject to state regulation since 1991. One of the key, if controversial, requirements of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act forbids the provision of 'treatment services' to a woman 'unless account has been taken of the welfare of any child who may be born as a result of the treatment (including the need of that child for a father) and of any other child who may be affected by the birth' (Section 13 (5)). In practice, fertility clinics have found it difficult to operationalise this requirement and critics have complained that it has been used to discriminate against (mostly) women and (occasionally) heterosexual couples. In 2006, the UK statutory regulator, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), revised its guidance to fertility clinics on undertaking Section 13(5) 'welfare assessments'. The government has also indicated its intention to remove reference to a child's need for a father as part of its proposed overhaul of the Act. This paper uses a social constructionist perspective to examine the revised requirements to take account of the welfare of the child and argues that welfare assessments should be underpinned by 'respectful uncertainty' and 'healthy scepticism'.

LanguageEnglish
Pages31-43
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2008

Fingerprint

Child Welfare
Embryology
Fertilization
Fathers
Fertility
Heterosexuality
Uncertainty
Parturition
Therapeutics

Cite this

@article{3abdabca60b24353a3745a901f91d1c2,
title = "Welfare of the child assessments in assisted conception: A social constructionist perspective",
abstract = "Assisted conception services in the UK have been subject to state regulation since 1991. One of the key, if controversial, requirements of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act forbids the provision of 'treatment services' to a woman 'unless account has been taken of the welfare of any child who may be born as a result of the treatment (including the need of that child for a father) and of any other child who may be affected by the birth' (Section 13 (5)). In practice, fertility clinics have found it difficult to operationalise this requirement and critics have complained that it has been used to discriminate against (mostly) women and (occasionally) heterosexual couples. In 2006, the UK statutory regulator, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), revised its guidance to fertility clinics on undertaking Section 13(5) 'welfare assessments'. The government has also indicated its intention to remove reference to a child's need for a father as part of its proposed overhaul of the Act. This paper uses a social constructionist perspective to examine the revised requirements to take account of the welfare of the child and argues that welfare assessments should be underpinned by 'respectful uncertainty' and 'healthy scepticism'.",
author = "Eric Blyth and Vivian Burr and Abigail Farrand",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/02646830701691301",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "31--43",
journal = "Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology",
issn = "0264-6838",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Welfare of the child assessments in assisted conception : A social constructionist perspective. / Blyth, Eric; Burr, Vivian; Farrand, Abigail.

In: Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 15.02.2008, p. 31-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Welfare of the child assessments in assisted conception

T2 - Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

AU - Blyth, Eric

AU - Burr, Vivian

AU - Farrand, Abigail

PY - 2008/2/15

Y1 - 2008/2/15

N2 - Assisted conception services in the UK have been subject to state regulation since 1991. One of the key, if controversial, requirements of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act forbids the provision of 'treatment services' to a woman 'unless account has been taken of the welfare of any child who may be born as a result of the treatment (including the need of that child for a father) and of any other child who may be affected by the birth' (Section 13 (5)). In practice, fertility clinics have found it difficult to operationalise this requirement and critics have complained that it has been used to discriminate against (mostly) women and (occasionally) heterosexual couples. In 2006, the UK statutory regulator, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), revised its guidance to fertility clinics on undertaking Section 13(5) 'welfare assessments'. The government has also indicated its intention to remove reference to a child's need for a father as part of its proposed overhaul of the Act. This paper uses a social constructionist perspective to examine the revised requirements to take account of the welfare of the child and argues that welfare assessments should be underpinned by 'respectful uncertainty' and 'healthy scepticism'.

AB - Assisted conception services in the UK have been subject to state regulation since 1991. One of the key, if controversial, requirements of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act forbids the provision of 'treatment services' to a woman 'unless account has been taken of the welfare of any child who may be born as a result of the treatment (including the need of that child for a father) and of any other child who may be affected by the birth' (Section 13 (5)). In practice, fertility clinics have found it difficult to operationalise this requirement and critics have complained that it has been used to discriminate against (mostly) women and (occasionally) heterosexual couples. In 2006, the UK statutory regulator, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), revised its guidance to fertility clinics on undertaking Section 13(5) 'welfare assessments'. The government has also indicated its intention to remove reference to a child's need for a father as part of its proposed overhaul of the Act. This paper uses a social constructionist perspective to examine the revised requirements to take account of the welfare of the child and argues that welfare assessments should be underpinned by 'respectful uncertainty' and 'healthy scepticism'.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39449139006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02646830701691301

DO - 10.1080/02646830701691301

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 31

EP - 43

JO - Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

JF - Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

SN - 0264-6838

IS - 1

ER -