Wellbeing, the lone HR practitioner, and managing volunteers: caring for the carers’ carers

Julie Davies, Alex Kevill, Dinuka Herath

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting Abstract

Abstract

In this paper we consider the role of the HR manager in managing their own self-care (Malloy, 2013) while working with hospice volunteers (Alfes, Antunes, Shantz et al., 2017). Carvalho & Sampaio (2017) argue that there has been a lack of a strategic approach to challenges associated with the human resource management of volunteers. How does the HR practitioner regulate their own emotional labour and professional boundaries while being responsible for volunteers who support medical and nursing and other staff who care for patients and their families? How does the HR practitioner demonstrate their own engagement with the organisation without becoming over-committed? How can the HR professional devise policies and practices to optimise the benefits of volunteering (Thoits & Hewitt, 2001) while mitigating the potential for over-commitment in hospice volunteers? We explore theoretical concepts on boundary work and over-commitment in supporting wellbeing within an end of life care setting. Drawing on one-to-one qualitative interviews and insights from the ability, motivation, opportunity (AMO) framework and literature on SMEs (small and medium size enterprises), we highlight policy and practices to support individual wellbeing and performance management. Specifically, we focus on the concept of ‘flow’ (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997) in delineating boundaries between professional and personal identities. We discuss practical implications for the career development and wellbeing of HR practitioners in UK hospices and the risks of over-commitment (Earnshaw-Smith, 1987). We also reflect on the impact of performance management and recovery time for both HR managers and volunteers. Initial findings suggest the importance of deliberate and regular interventions in the workplace to buffer work and personal space; outsourcing employee assistance for rapid responses to symptoms of distress and overload; frequent audits and appraisals to identify over-commitment; strict application of rest and recovery policies; co-mentoring support within HR managers’ networks in the hospice sector
Original languageEnglish
Article numberP-270
Pages (from-to)A106
JournalBMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
Volume8
Issue numberS2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018
EventHospice UK National Conference: Transforming Palliative Care - Telford International Conference Centre, Telford, United Kingdom
Duration: 27 Nov 201828 Nov 2018
https://www.hospiceuk.org/what-we-offer/courses-conferences-and-learning-events/conferences/hospice-uk-national-conf (Link to Conference Information)

Fingerprint

Hospices
Caregivers
Volunteers
Personal Space
Outsourced Services
Time Management
Aptitude
Terminal Care
Nursing Staff
Self Care
Workplace
Motivation
Patient Care
Buffers
Organizations
Interviews

Cite this

@article{389967f2e8ef401b8b96bb1a784db09c,
title = "Wellbeing, the lone HR practitioner, and managing volunteers: caring for the carers’ carers",
abstract = "In this paper we consider the role of the HR manager in managing their own self-care (Malloy, 2013) while working with hospice volunteers (Alfes, Antunes, Shantz et al., 2017). Carvalho & Sampaio (2017) argue that there has been a lack of a strategic approach to challenges associated with the human resource management of volunteers. How does the HR practitioner regulate their own emotional labour and professional boundaries while being responsible for volunteers who support medical and nursing and other staff who care for patients and their families? How does the HR practitioner demonstrate their own engagement with the organisation without becoming over-committed? How can the HR professional devise policies and practices to optimise the benefits of volunteering (Thoits & Hewitt, 2001) while mitigating the potential for over-commitment in hospice volunteers? We explore theoretical concepts on boundary work and over-commitment in supporting wellbeing within an end of life care setting. Drawing on one-to-one qualitative interviews and insights from the ability, motivation, opportunity (AMO) framework and literature on SMEs (small and medium size enterprises), we highlight policy and practices to support individual wellbeing and performance management. Specifically, we focus on the concept of ‘flow’ (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997) in delineating boundaries between professional and personal identities. We discuss practical implications for the career development and wellbeing of HR practitioners in UK hospices and the risks of over-commitment (Earnshaw-Smith, 1987). We also reflect on the impact of performance management and recovery time for both HR managers and volunteers. Initial findings suggest the importance of deliberate and regular interventions in the workplace to buffer work and personal space; outsourcing employee assistance for rapid responses to symptoms of distress and overload; frequent audits and appraisals to identify over-commitment; strict application of rest and recovery policies; co-mentoring support within HR managers’ networks in the hospice sector",
author = "Julie Davies and Alex Kevill and Dinuka Herath",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "A106",
journal = "BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care",
issn = "2045-435X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "S2",

}

Wellbeing, the lone HR practitioner, and managing volunteers: caring for the carers’ carers. / Davies, Julie; Kevill, Alex ; Herath, Dinuka.

In: BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, Vol. 8, No. S2, P-270, 01.11.2018, p. A106.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting Abstract

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wellbeing, the lone HR practitioner, and managing volunteers: caring for the carers’ carers

AU - Davies, Julie

AU - Kevill, Alex

AU - Herath, Dinuka

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - In this paper we consider the role of the HR manager in managing their own self-care (Malloy, 2013) while working with hospice volunteers (Alfes, Antunes, Shantz et al., 2017). Carvalho & Sampaio (2017) argue that there has been a lack of a strategic approach to challenges associated with the human resource management of volunteers. How does the HR practitioner regulate their own emotional labour and professional boundaries while being responsible for volunteers who support medical and nursing and other staff who care for patients and their families? How does the HR practitioner demonstrate their own engagement with the organisation without becoming over-committed? How can the HR professional devise policies and practices to optimise the benefits of volunteering (Thoits & Hewitt, 2001) while mitigating the potential for over-commitment in hospice volunteers? We explore theoretical concepts on boundary work and over-commitment in supporting wellbeing within an end of life care setting. Drawing on one-to-one qualitative interviews and insights from the ability, motivation, opportunity (AMO) framework and literature on SMEs (small and medium size enterprises), we highlight policy and practices to support individual wellbeing and performance management. Specifically, we focus on the concept of ‘flow’ (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997) in delineating boundaries between professional and personal identities. We discuss practical implications for the career development and wellbeing of HR practitioners in UK hospices and the risks of over-commitment (Earnshaw-Smith, 1987). We also reflect on the impact of performance management and recovery time for both HR managers and volunteers. Initial findings suggest the importance of deliberate and regular interventions in the workplace to buffer work and personal space; outsourcing employee assistance for rapid responses to symptoms of distress and overload; frequent audits and appraisals to identify over-commitment; strict application of rest and recovery policies; co-mentoring support within HR managers’ networks in the hospice sector

AB - In this paper we consider the role of the HR manager in managing their own self-care (Malloy, 2013) while working with hospice volunteers (Alfes, Antunes, Shantz et al., 2017). Carvalho & Sampaio (2017) argue that there has been a lack of a strategic approach to challenges associated with the human resource management of volunteers. How does the HR practitioner regulate their own emotional labour and professional boundaries while being responsible for volunteers who support medical and nursing and other staff who care for patients and their families? How does the HR practitioner demonstrate their own engagement with the organisation without becoming over-committed? How can the HR professional devise policies and practices to optimise the benefits of volunteering (Thoits & Hewitt, 2001) while mitigating the potential for over-commitment in hospice volunteers? We explore theoretical concepts on boundary work and over-commitment in supporting wellbeing within an end of life care setting. Drawing on one-to-one qualitative interviews and insights from the ability, motivation, opportunity (AMO) framework and literature on SMEs (small and medium size enterprises), we highlight policy and practices to support individual wellbeing and performance management. Specifically, we focus on the concept of ‘flow’ (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997) in delineating boundaries between professional and personal identities. We discuss practical implications for the career development and wellbeing of HR practitioners in UK hospices and the risks of over-commitment (Earnshaw-Smith, 1987). We also reflect on the impact of performance management and recovery time for both HR managers and volunteers. Initial findings suggest the importance of deliberate and regular interventions in the workplace to buffer work and personal space; outsourcing employee assistance for rapid responses to symptoms of distress and overload; frequent audits and appraisals to identify over-commitment; strict application of rest and recovery policies; co-mentoring support within HR managers’ networks in the hospice sector

UR - https://spcare.bmj.com/content/8/Suppl_2/A106.2

M3 - Meeting Abstract

VL - 8

SP - A106

JO - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

JF - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

SN - 2045-435X

IS - S2

M1 - P-270

ER -