What a 'risky' body can do: Why people's health choices are not all based in evidence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Risks - and particularly health risks - are predictions about outcomes of human actions. However, actions always have multiple outcomes, and simplistic assertions that a behaviour is 'risky' discounts the multiplicity of ways in which outcomes are differentially valorised. The paper looks at three models of the relationship between risks and hazards, and concludes that hazards are constructs generated from narrow perspectives on the consequences of action. Acknowledging this, the paper goes on to look at people's behaviour as'experiments in living'. Asking'what can a body do?' is a way to assess the possibilities for such experiments. Looking at the use of the recreational drug Ecstasy, it is argued that drug users apply a knowledge ability of what a body can do which derives from positive assessments of Ecstasy's effects rather than medical knowledge abilities. What appears to be resistance to research evidence about behaviour is actually pressure against normative limits of what a body can do.
LanguageEnglish
Pages166-179
Number of pages14
JournalHealth Education Journal
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Health
Street Drugs
Drug Users
Pressure
Research

Cite this

@article{50970d3bdf1d456e9ba5417e5287e52e,
title = "What a 'risky' body can do: Why people's health choices are not all based in evidence",
abstract = "Risks - and particularly health risks - are predictions about outcomes of human actions. However, actions always have multiple outcomes, and simplistic assertions that a behaviour is 'risky' discounts the multiplicity of ways in which outcomes are differentially valorised. The paper looks at three models of the relationship between risks and hazards, and concludes that hazards are constructs generated from narrow perspectives on the consequences of action. Acknowledging this, the paper goes on to look at people's behaviour as'experiments in living'. Asking'what can a body do?' is a way to assess the possibilities for such experiments. Looking at the use of the recreational drug Ecstasy, it is argued that drug users apply a knowledge ability of what a body can do which derives from positive assessments of Ecstasy's effects rather than medical knowledge abilities. What appears to be resistance to research evidence about behaviour is actually pressure against normative limits of what a body can do.",
keywords = "Health choices, Health hazards, Health risks, Risky behaviour",
author = "Fox, {Nick J.}",
year = "2002",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/001789690206100207",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "166--179",
journal = "Health Education Journal",
issn = "0017-8969",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

What a 'risky' body can do : Why people's health choices are not all based in evidence. / Fox, Nick J.

In: Health Education Journal, Vol. 61, No. 2, 06.2002, p. 166-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What a 'risky' body can do

T2 - Health Education Journal

AU - Fox, Nick J.

PY - 2002/6

Y1 - 2002/6

N2 - Risks - and particularly health risks - are predictions about outcomes of human actions. However, actions always have multiple outcomes, and simplistic assertions that a behaviour is 'risky' discounts the multiplicity of ways in which outcomes are differentially valorised. The paper looks at three models of the relationship between risks and hazards, and concludes that hazards are constructs generated from narrow perspectives on the consequences of action. Acknowledging this, the paper goes on to look at people's behaviour as'experiments in living'. Asking'what can a body do?' is a way to assess the possibilities for such experiments. Looking at the use of the recreational drug Ecstasy, it is argued that drug users apply a knowledge ability of what a body can do which derives from positive assessments of Ecstasy's effects rather than medical knowledge abilities. What appears to be resistance to research evidence about behaviour is actually pressure against normative limits of what a body can do.

AB - Risks - and particularly health risks - are predictions about outcomes of human actions. However, actions always have multiple outcomes, and simplistic assertions that a behaviour is 'risky' discounts the multiplicity of ways in which outcomes are differentially valorised. The paper looks at three models of the relationship between risks and hazards, and concludes that hazards are constructs generated from narrow perspectives on the consequences of action. Acknowledging this, the paper goes on to look at people's behaviour as'experiments in living'. Asking'what can a body do?' is a way to assess the possibilities for such experiments. Looking at the use of the recreational drug Ecstasy, it is argued that drug users apply a knowledge ability of what a body can do which derives from positive assessments of Ecstasy's effects rather than medical knowledge abilities. What appears to be resistance to research evidence about behaviour is actually pressure against normative limits of what a body can do.

KW - Health choices

KW - Health hazards

KW - Health risks

KW - Risky behaviour

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036307976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001789690206100207

DO - 10.1177/001789690206100207

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 166

EP - 179

JO - Health Education Journal

JF - Health Education Journal

SN - 0017-8969

IS - 2

ER -