What do introduction sections tell us about the intent of scholarly work

A contribution on contributions

John Nicholson, Peter LaPlaca, Ahmed Al-abdin, Richard Breese, Zaheer Khan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents empirical examination of the semantics of contribution claims in the introduction sections of journal articles, a significantly under-examined area of scholarly activity, which underpins the methodical act of communicating the value of research to an audience. The paper presents a systematic review of 538 papers in three leading industrial marketing journals, Industrial Marketing Management, the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing and the Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing and uses a phased approach to categorize contribution claims made by authors in their introductions and abstracts. The paper identifies four main categories of contribution, defined as incremental, revelatory, replicatory and consolidatory, with sub-categorizations within them, and reports on the proportionality of these strategies in the sample while capturing the semantic games played by authors in pursuit of these claims. Specific findings are of interest to industrial marketers, but the conceptual framework and systematic methods presented in the paper are transferable to any discipline or body of work, and therefore have broader disciplinary appeal. Findings are also of interest to authors, reviewers and editors for coalescing fragmented understanding of contribution strategies into a coherent framework for action.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-219
Number of pages14
JournalIndustrial Marketing Management
Volume73
Early online date5 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Industrial marketing
Systematic review
Defined contribution
Marketing management
Marketers
Business-to-business marketing
Conceptual framework
Proportionality
Incremental

Cite this

Nicholson, John ; LaPlaca, Peter ; Al-abdin, Ahmed ; Breese, Richard ; Khan, Zaheer. / What do introduction sections tell us about the intent of scholarly work : A contribution on contributions. In: Industrial Marketing Management. 2018 ; Vol. 73. pp. 206-219.
@article{c688515933d14dbbb9f23d16df9fdab9,
title = "What do introduction sections tell us about the intent of scholarly work: A contribution on contributions",
abstract = "This paper presents empirical examination of the semantics of contribution claims in the introduction sections of journal articles, a significantly under-examined area of scholarly activity, which underpins the methodical act of communicating the value of research to an audience. The paper presents a systematic review of 538 papers in three leading industrial marketing journals, Industrial Marketing Management, the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing and the Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing and uses a phased approach to categorize contribution claims made by authors in their introductions and abstracts. The paper identifies four main categories of contribution, defined as incremental, revelatory, replicatory and consolidatory, with sub-categorizations within them, and reports on the proportionality of these strategies in the sample while capturing the semantic games played by authors in pursuit of these claims. Specific findings are of interest to industrial marketers, but the conceptual framework and systematic methods presented in the paper are transferable to any discipline or body of work, and therefore have broader disciplinary appeal. Findings are also of interest to authors, reviewers and editors for coalescing fragmented understanding of contribution strategies into a coherent framework for action.",
keywords = "Contributions, Gap-spotting, Literature review, Methods, Problematization, Replication",
author = "John Nicholson and Peter LaPlaca and Ahmed Al-abdin and Richard Breese and Zaheer Khan",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.014",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "206--219",
journal = "Industrial Marketing Management",
issn = "0019-8501",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

What do introduction sections tell us about the intent of scholarly work : A contribution on contributions. / Nicholson, John; LaPlaca, Peter; Al-abdin, Ahmed; Breese, Richard; Khan, Zaheer.

In: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 73, 01.08.2018, p. 206-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What do introduction sections tell us about the intent of scholarly work

T2 - A contribution on contributions

AU - Nicholson, John

AU - LaPlaca, Peter

AU - Al-abdin, Ahmed

AU - Breese, Richard

AU - Khan, Zaheer

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - This paper presents empirical examination of the semantics of contribution claims in the introduction sections of journal articles, a significantly under-examined area of scholarly activity, which underpins the methodical act of communicating the value of research to an audience. The paper presents a systematic review of 538 papers in three leading industrial marketing journals, Industrial Marketing Management, the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing and the Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing and uses a phased approach to categorize contribution claims made by authors in their introductions and abstracts. The paper identifies four main categories of contribution, defined as incremental, revelatory, replicatory and consolidatory, with sub-categorizations within them, and reports on the proportionality of these strategies in the sample while capturing the semantic games played by authors in pursuit of these claims. Specific findings are of interest to industrial marketers, but the conceptual framework and systematic methods presented in the paper are transferable to any discipline or body of work, and therefore have broader disciplinary appeal. Findings are also of interest to authors, reviewers and editors for coalescing fragmented understanding of contribution strategies into a coherent framework for action.

AB - This paper presents empirical examination of the semantics of contribution claims in the introduction sections of journal articles, a significantly under-examined area of scholarly activity, which underpins the methodical act of communicating the value of research to an audience. The paper presents a systematic review of 538 papers in three leading industrial marketing journals, Industrial Marketing Management, the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing and the Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing and uses a phased approach to categorize contribution claims made by authors in their introductions and abstracts. The paper identifies four main categories of contribution, defined as incremental, revelatory, replicatory and consolidatory, with sub-categorizations within them, and reports on the proportionality of these strategies in the sample while capturing the semantic games played by authors in pursuit of these claims. Specific findings are of interest to industrial marketers, but the conceptual framework and systematic methods presented in the paper are transferable to any discipline or body of work, and therefore have broader disciplinary appeal. Findings are also of interest to authors, reviewers and editors for coalescing fragmented understanding of contribution strategies into a coherent framework for action.

KW - Contributions

KW - Gap-spotting

KW - Literature review

KW - Methods

KW - Problematization

KW - Replication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042849306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.014

DO - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.014

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 206

EP - 219

JO - Industrial Marketing Management

JF - Industrial Marketing Management

SN - 0019-8501

ER -