What influences referrals within community palliative care services? A qualitative case study

Catherine Walshe, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Chris Todd, Ann Caress

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the utilisation of community palliative care services varies considerably according to different patient characteristics. Most literature describes this variability, but does not address why such differences exist. Exploring the processes underpinning referral making rather than simply describing the outcomes of referrals may further our understanding of this variability. The aim of this article was to investigate the influences on referral decisions made within community palliative care services. A qualitative case study strategy was adopted, studying three Primary Care Trusts in England, UK. Data collection used multiple methods (interviews, observation and documentary analysis) from multiple perspectives (including general and specialist palliative care professionals, patients, managers and commissioners). Two core influences on the way health care professionals made referral decisions are identified. First, their perception of their own role in providing palliative care; autonomous professionals make independent judgements about referrals, influenced by their expertise, workload, the special nature of palliative care and the relationship they develop with patients. Second, their perception about those to whom they may refer; professionals report needing to know about services to refer to, and then make a complex judgement about the professionals involved and what they could offer the referrer as well as the patient. These findings indicate that many more factors than an assessment of patients' clinical need affect referrals within community palliative care services. It appears that personal, inter-personal and interprofessional factors have the potential to shape referral practices. Practitioners could be more explicit about influences on decision making, and policy makers take account of these complex influences on referrals rather than just mandating change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-146
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume67
Issue number1
Early online date21 Apr 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Referral and Consultation
community
workload
Workload
Administrative Personnel
England
expertise
utilization
Primary Health Care
Decision Making
manager
health care
decision making
Observation
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care
interview
evidence

Cite this

Walshe, Catherine ; Chew-Graham, Carolyn ; Todd, Chris ; Caress, Ann. / What influences referrals within community palliative care services? A qualitative case study. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 137-146.
@article{8ae6cfc5ab4c4778bc492429a956921f,
title = "What influences referrals within community palliative care services? A qualitative case study",
abstract = "Evidence suggests that the utilisation of community palliative care services varies considerably according to different patient characteristics. Most literature describes this variability, but does not address why such differences exist. Exploring the processes underpinning referral making rather than simply describing the outcomes of referrals may further our understanding of this variability. The aim of this article was to investigate the influences on referral decisions made within community palliative care services. A qualitative case study strategy was adopted, studying three Primary Care Trusts in England, UK. Data collection used multiple methods (interviews, observation and documentary analysis) from multiple perspectives (including general and specialist palliative care professionals, patients, managers and commissioners). Two core influences on the way health care professionals made referral decisions are identified. First, their perception of their own role in providing palliative care; autonomous professionals make independent judgements about referrals, influenced by their expertise, workload, the special nature of palliative care and the relationship they develop with patients. Second, their perception about those to whom they may refer; professionals report needing to know about services to refer to, and then make a complex judgement about the professionals involved and what they could offer the referrer as well as the patient. These findings indicate that many more factors than an assessment of patients' clinical need affect referrals within community palliative care services. It appears that personal, inter-personal and interprofessional factors have the potential to shape referral practices. Practitioners could be more explicit about influences on decision making, and policy makers take account of these complex influences on referrals rather than just mandating change.",
keywords = "Case study, Interprofessional care, Palliative care, Primary health care, Referrals, UK",
author = "Catherine Walshe and Carolyn Chew-Graham and Chris Todd and Ann Caress",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.027",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "137--146",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "1",

}

What influences referrals within community palliative care services? A qualitative case study. / Walshe, Catherine; Chew-Graham, Carolyn; Todd, Chris; Caress, Ann.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 67, No. 1, 01.07.2008, p. 137-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What influences referrals within community palliative care services? A qualitative case study

AU - Walshe, Catherine

AU - Chew-Graham, Carolyn

AU - Todd, Chris

AU - Caress, Ann

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - Evidence suggests that the utilisation of community palliative care services varies considerably according to different patient characteristics. Most literature describes this variability, but does not address why such differences exist. Exploring the processes underpinning referral making rather than simply describing the outcomes of referrals may further our understanding of this variability. The aim of this article was to investigate the influences on referral decisions made within community palliative care services. A qualitative case study strategy was adopted, studying three Primary Care Trusts in England, UK. Data collection used multiple methods (interviews, observation and documentary analysis) from multiple perspectives (including general and specialist palliative care professionals, patients, managers and commissioners). Two core influences on the way health care professionals made referral decisions are identified. First, their perception of their own role in providing palliative care; autonomous professionals make independent judgements about referrals, influenced by their expertise, workload, the special nature of palliative care and the relationship they develop with patients. Second, their perception about those to whom they may refer; professionals report needing to know about services to refer to, and then make a complex judgement about the professionals involved and what they could offer the referrer as well as the patient. These findings indicate that many more factors than an assessment of patients' clinical need affect referrals within community palliative care services. It appears that personal, inter-personal and interprofessional factors have the potential to shape referral practices. Practitioners could be more explicit about influences on decision making, and policy makers take account of these complex influences on referrals rather than just mandating change.

AB - Evidence suggests that the utilisation of community palliative care services varies considerably according to different patient characteristics. Most literature describes this variability, but does not address why such differences exist. Exploring the processes underpinning referral making rather than simply describing the outcomes of referrals may further our understanding of this variability. The aim of this article was to investigate the influences on referral decisions made within community palliative care services. A qualitative case study strategy was adopted, studying three Primary Care Trusts in England, UK. Data collection used multiple methods (interviews, observation and documentary analysis) from multiple perspectives (including general and specialist palliative care professionals, patients, managers and commissioners). Two core influences on the way health care professionals made referral decisions are identified. First, their perception of their own role in providing palliative care; autonomous professionals make independent judgements about referrals, influenced by their expertise, workload, the special nature of palliative care and the relationship they develop with patients. Second, their perception about those to whom they may refer; professionals report needing to know about services to refer to, and then make a complex judgement about the professionals involved and what they could offer the referrer as well as the patient. These findings indicate that many more factors than an assessment of patients' clinical need affect referrals within community palliative care services. It appears that personal, inter-personal and interprofessional factors have the potential to shape referral practices. Practitioners could be more explicit about influences on decision making, and policy makers take account of these complex influences on referrals rather than just mandating change.

KW - Case study

KW - Interprofessional care

KW - Palliative care

KW - Primary health care

KW - Referrals

KW - UK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44349117287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.027

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.027

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 137

EP - 146

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 1

ER -