What is news?: News values revisited (again)

Deirdre O'neill, Tony Harcup

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The deceptively simple question “What is news?” remains pertinent even as we ponder the future of journalism in the digital age. This article examines news values within mainstream journalism and considers the extent to which news values may be changing since earlier landmark studies were undertaken. Its starting point is Harcup and O’Neill’s widely-cited 2001 updating of Galtung and Ruge’s influential 1965 taxonomy of news values. Just as that study put Galtung and Ruge’s criteria to the test with an empirical content analysis of published news, this new study explores the extent to which Harcup and O’Neill’s revised list of news values remain relevant given the challenges (and opportunities) faced by journalism today, including the emergence of social media. A review of recent literature contextualises the findings of a fresh content analysis of news values within a range of UK media 15 years on from the last study. The article concludes by suggesting a revised and updated set of contemporary news values, whilst acknowledging that no taxonomy can ever explain everything.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages19
JournalJournalism Studies
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

news value
Taxonomies
news
journalism
taxonomy
content analysis
social media

Cite this

O'neill, Deirdre ; Harcup, Tony. / What is news? News values revisited (again). In: Journalism Studies. 2016.
@article{60b3e48cc806487abd3ce230189a73ef,
title = "What is news?: News values revisited (again)",
abstract = "The deceptively simple question “What is news?” remains pertinent even as we ponder the future of journalism in the digital age. This article examines news values within mainstream journalism and considers the extent to which news values may be changing since earlier landmark studies were undertaken. Its starting point is Harcup and O’Neill’s widely-cited 2001 updating of Galtung and Ruge’s influential 1965 taxonomy of news values. Just as that study put Galtung and Ruge’s criteria to the test with an empirical content analysis of published news, this new study explores the extent to which Harcup and O’Neill’s revised list of news values remain relevant given the challenges (and opportunities) faced by journalism today, including the emergence of social media. A review of recent literature contextualises the findings of a fresh content analysis of news values within a range of UK media 15 years on from the last study. The article concludes by suggesting a revised and updated set of contemporary news values, whilst acknowledging that no taxonomy can ever explain everything.",
keywords = "Galtung and Ruge, Harcup and O'Neill, news values, newspapers, selection, shareability, social media, taxonomy",
author = "Deirdre O'neill and Tony Harcup",
note = "Accepted date taken from e-prints as not available on publisher's website. SH 12/9/17.",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193",
language = "English",
journal = "Journalism Studies",
issn = "1461-670X",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

What is news? News values revisited (again). / O'neill, Deirdre; Harcup, Tony.

In: Journalism Studies, 01.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is news?

T2 - Journalism Studies

AU - O'neill, Deirdre

AU - Harcup, Tony

N1 - Accepted date taken from e-prints as not available on publisher's website. SH 12/9/17.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - The deceptively simple question “What is news?” remains pertinent even as we ponder the future of journalism in the digital age. This article examines news values within mainstream journalism and considers the extent to which news values may be changing since earlier landmark studies were undertaken. Its starting point is Harcup and O’Neill’s widely-cited 2001 updating of Galtung and Ruge’s influential 1965 taxonomy of news values. Just as that study put Galtung and Ruge’s criteria to the test with an empirical content analysis of published news, this new study explores the extent to which Harcup and O’Neill’s revised list of news values remain relevant given the challenges (and opportunities) faced by journalism today, including the emergence of social media. A review of recent literature contextualises the findings of a fresh content analysis of news values within a range of UK media 15 years on from the last study. The article concludes by suggesting a revised and updated set of contemporary news values, whilst acknowledging that no taxonomy can ever explain everything.

AB - The deceptively simple question “What is news?” remains pertinent even as we ponder the future of journalism in the digital age. This article examines news values within mainstream journalism and considers the extent to which news values may be changing since earlier landmark studies were undertaken. Its starting point is Harcup and O’Neill’s widely-cited 2001 updating of Galtung and Ruge’s influential 1965 taxonomy of news values. Just as that study put Galtung and Ruge’s criteria to the test with an empirical content analysis of published news, this new study explores the extent to which Harcup and O’Neill’s revised list of news values remain relevant given the challenges (and opportunities) faced by journalism today, including the emergence of social media. A review of recent literature contextualises the findings of a fresh content analysis of news values within a range of UK media 15 years on from the last study. The article concludes by suggesting a revised and updated set of contemporary news values, whilst acknowledging that no taxonomy can ever explain everything.

KW - Galtung and Ruge

KW - Harcup and O'Neill

KW - news values

KW - newspapers

KW - selection

KW - shareability

KW - social media

KW - taxonomy

U2 - 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193

DO - 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193

M3 - Article

JO - Journalism Studies

JF - Journalism Studies

SN - 1461-670X

ER -