What matters to users of services? An explorative study to promote shared decision making in health care

Kath Padgett, Christine Rhodes, Maureen Lumb, Penny Morris, Sue Sherwin, Jools Symons, Joannie Tate, Ken Townend

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Involving service users and carers in decisions about their health care is a key feature of health-care practice. Professional health and social care students need to develop skills and attributes to best enable this to happen. Aims The aims were to explore service user and carer perceptions of behaviours, attributes and context required to enable shared decision making; to compare these perceptions to those of students and academic staff with a view to utilizing the findings to inform the development of student assessment tools. Methods A mixed methods approach was used including action learning groups (ALG) and an iterative process alongside a modified Delphi survey. Participants The ALGs were from an existing service user and carer network. The survey was sent to sixty students, sixty academics and 30 service users from 16 different professional disciplines, spanning four Universities in England. Results The collaborative enquiry process and survey identified general agreement that being open and honest, listening, showing respect, giving time and being up to date were important. The qualitative findings identified that individual interpretation was a key factor. An unexpected result was an insight into possible insecurities of students. Conclusions The findings indicate that distilling rich qualitative information into a format for student assessment tools could be problematic as the individual context could be lost, it is therefore proposed that the information could be better used as a learning rather than assessment tool. Several of those involved identified how they valued the process and found it beneficial.

LanguageEnglish
Pages418-428
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Expectations
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Students
Delivery of Health Care
Caregivers
Learning
Group Processes
England
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Padgett, Kath ; Rhodes, Christine ; Lumb, Maureen ; Morris, Penny ; Sherwin, Sue ; Symons, Jools ; Tate, Joannie ; Townend, Ken. / What matters to users of services? An explorative study to promote shared decision making in health care. In: Health Expectations. 2014 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 418-428.
@article{d6e810efdd2a41778c22ebcb6bce4228,
title = "What matters to users of services? An explorative study to promote shared decision making in health care",
abstract = "Background Involving service users and carers in decisions about their health care is a key feature of health-care practice. Professional health and social care students need to develop skills and attributes to best enable this to happen. Aims The aims were to explore service user and carer perceptions of behaviours, attributes and context required to enable shared decision making; to compare these perceptions to those of students and academic staff with a view to utilizing the findings to inform the development of student assessment tools. Methods A mixed methods approach was used including action learning groups (ALG) and an iterative process alongside a modified Delphi survey. Participants The ALGs were from an existing service user and carer network. The survey was sent to sixty students, sixty academics and 30 service users from 16 different professional disciplines, spanning four Universities in England. Results The collaborative enquiry process and survey identified general agreement that being open and honest, listening, showing respect, giving time and being up to date were important. The qualitative findings identified that individual interpretation was a key factor. An unexpected result was an insight into possible insecurities of students. Conclusions The findings indicate that distilling rich qualitative information into a format for student assessment tools could be problematic as the individual context could be lost, it is therefore proposed that the information could be better used as a learning rather than assessment tool. Several of those involved identified how they valued the process and found it beneficial.",
keywords = "Health care education, Participative research, Patient centred care, Patient involvement, Service user and carer involvement, Shared decision making",
author = "Kath Padgett and Christine Rhodes and Maureen Lumb and Penny Morris and Sue Sherwin and Jools Symons and Joannie Tate and Ken Townend",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00767.x",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "418--428",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley Open Access",
number = "3",

}

What matters to users of services? An explorative study to promote shared decision making in health care. / Padgett, Kath; Rhodes, Christine; Lumb, Maureen; Morris, Penny; Sherwin, Sue; Symons, Jools; Tate, Joannie; Townend, Ken.

In: Health Expectations, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2014, p. 418-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What matters to users of services? An explorative study to promote shared decision making in health care

AU - Padgett, Kath

AU - Rhodes, Christine

AU - Lumb, Maureen

AU - Morris, Penny

AU - Sherwin, Sue

AU - Symons, Jools

AU - Tate, Joannie

AU - Townend, Ken

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background Involving service users and carers in decisions about their health care is a key feature of health-care practice. Professional health and social care students need to develop skills and attributes to best enable this to happen. Aims The aims were to explore service user and carer perceptions of behaviours, attributes and context required to enable shared decision making; to compare these perceptions to those of students and academic staff with a view to utilizing the findings to inform the development of student assessment tools. Methods A mixed methods approach was used including action learning groups (ALG) and an iterative process alongside a modified Delphi survey. Participants The ALGs were from an existing service user and carer network. The survey was sent to sixty students, sixty academics and 30 service users from 16 different professional disciplines, spanning four Universities in England. Results The collaborative enquiry process and survey identified general agreement that being open and honest, listening, showing respect, giving time and being up to date were important. The qualitative findings identified that individual interpretation was a key factor. An unexpected result was an insight into possible insecurities of students. Conclusions The findings indicate that distilling rich qualitative information into a format for student assessment tools could be problematic as the individual context could be lost, it is therefore proposed that the information could be better used as a learning rather than assessment tool. Several of those involved identified how they valued the process and found it beneficial.

AB - Background Involving service users and carers in decisions about their health care is a key feature of health-care practice. Professional health and social care students need to develop skills and attributes to best enable this to happen. Aims The aims were to explore service user and carer perceptions of behaviours, attributes and context required to enable shared decision making; to compare these perceptions to those of students and academic staff with a view to utilizing the findings to inform the development of student assessment tools. Methods A mixed methods approach was used including action learning groups (ALG) and an iterative process alongside a modified Delphi survey. Participants The ALGs were from an existing service user and carer network. The survey was sent to sixty students, sixty academics and 30 service users from 16 different professional disciplines, spanning four Universities in England. Results The collaborative enquiry process and survey identified general agreement that being open and honest, listening, showing respect, giving time and being up to date were important. The qualitative findings identified that individual interpretation was a key factor. An unexpected result was an insight into possible insecurities of students. Conclusions The findings indicate that distilling rich qualitative information into a format for student assessment tools could be problematic as the individual context could be lost, it is therefore proposed that the information could be better used as a learning rather than assessment tool. Several of those involved identified how they valued the process and found it beneficial.

KW - Health care education

KW - Participative research

KW - Patient centred care

KW - Patient involvement

KW - Service user and carer involvement

KW - Shared decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899650899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00767.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00767.x

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 418

EP - 428

JO - Health Expectations

T2 - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 3

ER -