What, why and how - the policy, purpose and practice of grammatical terminology

Ann Harris, Marie Helks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article critically examines the literature around grammar and grammatical terminology. It is essentially a critical consideration of the debates in England and Wales in four main parts. Part 1 considers debates in policy, the “What”, i.e. grammatical terminology from the perspective of national policy as defined by the English National Curriculum for Key Stages 1 and 2, and the Key Stage 2 “Grammar, Punctuation and Spelling Test”. Part 2, Debates in Purpose, examines the “Why”: it views grammatical terminology through a more theoretical lens which considers the potential purpose and value of explicit grammatical terminology in the classroom. Part 3 touches upon Debates in Practice, the “How”, examining what is already understood about the teaching of grammatical terminology in terms of grammar pedagogy, language acquisition and word learning. While each part has a distinct focus, the field is complex with overlap and interrelated issues. The final part looks briefly at teacher and pupil perspectives.
LanguageEnglish
Pages169-185
Number of pages17
JournalEnglish in Education
Volume52
Issue number3
Early online date20 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Fingerprint

technical language
grammar
language acquisition
pupil
curriculum
classroom
Teaching
teacher
learning
Grammar
Values

Cite this

@article{47135a33e9214fabaf3e866f7c92f4d2,
title = "What, why and how - the policy, purpose and practice of grammatical terminology",
abstract = "This article critically examines the literature around grammar and grammatical terminology. It is essentially a critical consideration of the debates in England and Wales in four main parts. Part 1 considers debates in policy, the “What”, i.e. grammatical terminology from the perspective of national policy as defined by the English National Curriculum for Key Stages 1 and 2, and the Key Stage 2 “Grammar, Punctuation and Spelling Test”. Part 2, Debates in Purpose, examines the “Why”: it views grammatical terminology through a more theoretical lens which considers the potential purpose and value of explicit grammatical terminology in the classroom. Part 3 touches upon Debates in Practice, the “How”, examining what is already understood about the teaching of grammatical terminology in terms of grammar pedagogy, language acquisition and word learning. While each part has a distinct focus, the field is complex with overlap and interrelated issues. The final part looks briefly at teacher and pupil perspectives.",
keywords = "Grammar terminology, grammar pedagogy, English Nation al Curriculum, primary education, education policy",
author = "Ann Harris and Marie Helks",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/04250494.2018.1507503",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "169--185",
journal = "English in Education",
issn = "0425-0494",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

What, why and how - the policy, purpose and practice of grammatical terminology. / Harris, Ann; Helks, Marie.

In: English in Education, Vol. 52, No. 3, 11.2018, p. 169-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What, why and how - the policy, purpose and practice of grammatical terminology

AU - Harris, Ann

AU - Helks, Marie

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - This article critically examines the literature around grammar and grammatical terminology. It is essentially a critical consideration of the debates in England and Wales in four main parts. Part 1 considers debates in policy, the “What”, i.e. grammatical terminology from the perspective of national policy as defined by the English National Curriculum for Key Stages 1 and 2, and the Key Stage 2 “Grammar, Punctuation and Spelling Test”. Part 2, Debates in Purpose, examines the “Why”: it views grammatical terminology through a more theoretical lens which considers the potential purpose and value of explicit grammatical terminology in the classroom. Part 3 touches upon Debates in Practice, the “How”, examining what is already understood about the teaching of grammatical terminology in terms of grammar pedagogy, language acquisition and word learning. While each part has a distinct focus, the field is complex with overlap and interrelated issues. The final part looks briefly at teacher and pupil perspectives.

AB - This article critically examines the literature around grammar and grammatical terminology. It is essentially a critical consideration of the debates in England and Wales in four main parts. Part 1 considers debates in policy, the “What”, i.e. grammatical terminology from the perspective of national policy as defined by the English National Curriculum for Key Stages 1 and 2, and the Key Stage 2 “Grammar, Punctuation and Spelling Test”. Part 2, Debates in Purpose, examines the “Why”: it views grammatical terminology through a more theoretical lens which considers the potential purpose and value of explicit grammatical terminology in the classroom. Part 3 touches upon Debates in Practice, the “How”, examining what is already understood about the teaching of grammatical terminology in terms of grammar pedagogy, language acquisition and word learning. While each part has a distinct focus, the field is complex with overlap and interrelated issues. The final part looks briefly at teacher and pupil perspectives.

KW - Grammar terminology

KW - grammar pedagogy

KW - English Nation al Curriculum

KW - primary education

KW - education policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053526183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/04250494.2018.1507503

DO - 10.1080/04250494.2018.1507503

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 169

EP - 185

JO - English in Education

T2 - English in Education

JF - English in Education

SN - 0425-0494

IS - 3

ER -