‘When You're Sitting in the Room with Two People One of Whom... has Bashed the Hell Out of the Other": Possibilities and Challenges in the Use of FGCs and Restorative Approaches Following Domestic Violence

Robin Sen, Kate Morris, Gale Burford, Brid Featherstone, Calum Webb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Domestic violence continues to be a primary reason for referrals to state child welfare services in advanced industrialised countries. There is growing concern in many state child welfare services to develop responses to it that are both more effective and more humane. The use of restorative approaches, in particular Family Group Conferences (FGCs), has been suggested as one such response. This article draws from data gathered from an evaluation of a UK Government funded “Innovation Project” part of which extended the use of FGCs in an urban local authority area which was already making extensive use of them. This paper presents and explores a typology of FGCs used in situations of domestic violence: pragmatic, resolution-focussed and restorative FGCs, developed from the evaluation data and augmented by relevant literature. The study data revealed pragmatic FGCs to be the most used, restorative the least. It is suggested that each type of FGC brings potential benefits but only restorative FGCs offer the possibility of full restoration in the traditionally understood sense. It is argued that the present mother-centric, risk-adverse, child protection systems which currently operate in many countries provide a powerful resistor to the greater implementation of this restorative way of working.

LanguageEnglish
Pages441-449
Number of pages9
JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
Volume88
Early online date21 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

Domestic Violence
domestic violence
Group
Child Welfare
child welfare
pragmatics
child protection
Developed Countries
restoration
typology
data analysis
Referral and Consultation
Mothers
innovation
present
evaluation

Cite this

@article{ac3b5cb222ba473791c2da312ba8793c,
title = "‘When You're Sitting in the Room with Two People One of Whom... has Bashed the Hell Out of the Other{"}: Possibilities and Challenges in the Use of FGCs and Restorative Approaches Following Domestic Violence",
abstract = "Domestic violence continues to be a primary reason for referrals to state child welfare services in advanced industrialised countries. There is growing concern in many state child welfare services to develop responses to it that are both more effective and more humane. The use of restorative approaches, in particular Family Group Conferences (FGCs), has been suggested as one such response. This article draws from data gathered from an evaluation of a UK Government funded “Innovation Project” part of which extended the use of FGCs in an urban local authority area which was already making extensive use of them. This paper presents and explores a typology of FGCs used in situations of domestic violence: pragmatic, resolution-focussed and restorative FGCs, developed from the evaluation data and augmented by relevant literature. The study data revealed pragmatic FGCs to be the most used, restorative the least. It is suggested that each type of FGC brings potential benefits but only restorative FGCs offer the possibility of full restoration in the traditionally understood sense. It is argued that the present mother-centric, risk-adverse, child protection systems which currently operate in many countries provide a powerful resistor to the greater implementation of this restorative way of working.",
author = "Robin Sen and Kate Morris and Gale Burford and Brid Featherstone and Calum Webb",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.027",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "441--449",
journal = "Children and Youth Services Review",
issn = "0190-7409",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘When You're Sitting in the Room with Two People One of Whom... has Bashed the Hell Out of the Other"

T2 - Children and Youth Services Review

AU - Sen, Robin

AU - Morris, Kate

AU - Burford, Gale

AU - Featherstone, Brid

AU - Webb, Calum

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Domestic violence continues to be a primary reason for referrals to state child welfare services in advanced industrialised countries. There is growing concern in many state child welfare services to develop responses to it that are both more effective and more humane. The use of restorative approaches, in particular Family Group Conferences (FGCs), has been suggested as one such response. This article draws from data gathered from an evaluation of a UK Government funded “Innovation Project” part of which extended the use of FGCs in an urban local authority area which was already making extensive use of them. This paper presents and explores a typology of FGCs used in situations of domestic violence: pragmatic, resolution-focussed and restorative FGCs, developed from the evaluation data and augmented by relevant literature. The study data revealed pragmatic FGCs to be the most used, restorative the least. It is suggested that each type of FGC brings potential benefits but only restorative FGCs offer the possibility of full restoration in the traditionally understood sense. It is argued that the present mother-centric, risk-adverse, child protection systems which currently operate in many countries provide a powerful resistor to the greater implementation of this restorative way of working.

AB - Domestic violence continues to be a primary reason for referrals to state child welfare services in advanced industrialised countries. There is growing concern in many state child welfare services to develop responses to it that are both more effective and more humane. The use of restorative approaches, in particular Family Group Conferences (FGCs), has been suggested as one such response. This article draws from data gathered from an evaluation of a UK Government funded “Innovation Project” part of which extended the use of FGCs in an urban local authority area which was already making extensive use of them. This paper presents and explores a typology of FGCs used in situations of domestic violence: pragmatic, resolution-focussed and restorative FGCs, developed from the evaluation data and augmented by relevant literature. The study data revealed pragmatic FGCs to be the most used, restorative the least. It is suggested that each type of FGC brings potential benefits but only restorative FGCs offer the possibility of full restoration in the traditionally understood sense. It is argued that the present mother-centric, risk-adverse, child protection systems which currently operate in many countries provide a powerful resistor to the greater implementation of this restorative way of working.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044571018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.027

DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.027

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 441

EP - 449

JO - Children and Youth Services Review

JF - Children and Youth Services Review

SN - 0190-7409

ER -