Where Social Enterprise Practitioners Draw the Line

Towards an Understanding of Movement from Social Entrepreneurship as Boundary Work

Martin Purcell, Pam Seanor, Michael Bull, Susan Baines

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to offer new reflection upon the contested interaction of social enterprises with the public sector. It does this by fore fronting the notions of boundaries, boundary work and boundary objects. Design/methodology/approach-The paper reports qualitative research with social enterprise practitioners (from social enterprises and support agencies) in the north of England. Accounts elicited through interviews are combined with visual data in the form of pencil drawings made by practitioners when the authors invited them to respond to and rework diagrammatic models from the literature about the social and economic dimensions of social enterprise. Findings-Participants explained in words and images how normative images of social enterprise depicting linear and static boundaries inadequately represent the complexity of ideas and interactions in their world. Rather, they perceived an iterative process of crossing and re-crossing boundaries, with identities and practices which appeared to shift over time in relation to different priorities. Research limitations/implications-Through participant generated visual data in which social enterprise practitioners literally redrew models from the literature, the paper open space to show movement, transgression and change. Originality/value-This paper is timely as social enterprises are becoming increasingly prominent in the welfare mix. The authors make novel use of conversations and drawings in order to better understand the dynamic and everyday practices of social enterprise within public services. In doing this, the authors also potentially contribute to richer methodological resources for researching the movement of services between sectors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-368
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Public Sector Management
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

entrepreneurship
service sector
public service
open space
public sector
transgression
methodology
resource
tertiary sector
interaction
economics
qualitative research
conversation
welfare
interview
resources
Values

Cite this

@article{bc1d9abeb4454da7b4e3ba1853c658d5,
title = "Where Social Enterprise Practitioners Draw the Line: Towards an Understanding of Movement from Social Entrepreneurship as Boundary Work",
abstract = "Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to offer new reflection upon the contested interaction of social enterprises with the public sector. It does this by fore fronting the notions of boundaries, boundary work and boundary objects. Design/methodology/approach-The paper reports qualitative research with social enterprise practitioners (from social enterprises and support agencies) in the north of England. Accounts elicited through interviews are combined with visual data in the form of pencil drawings made by practitioners when the authors invited them to respond to and rework diagrammatic models from the literature about the social and economic dimensions of social enterprise. Findings-Participants explained in words and images how normative images of social enterprise depicting linear and static boundaries inadequately represent the complexity of ideas and interactions in their world. Rather, they perceived an iterative process of crossing and re-crossing boundaries, with identities and practices which appeared to shift over time in relation to different priorities. Research limitations/implications-Through participant generated visual data in which social enterprise practitioners literally redrew models from the literature, the paper open space to show movement, transgression and change. Originality/value-This paper is timely as social enterprises are becoming increasingly prominent in the welfare mix. The authors make novel use of conversations and drawings in order to better understand the dynamic and everyday practices of social enterprise within public services. In doing this, the authors also potentially contribute to richer methodological resources for researching the movement of services between sectors.",
keywords = "Boundary Objects, Boundary Work, Public Services, Social Enterprise, Transgression, Visual Data",
author = "Martin Purcell and Pam Seanor and Michael Bull and Susan Baines",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1108/IJPSM-11-2012-0139",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "353--368",
journal = "International Journal of Public Sector Management",
issn = "0951-3558",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Where Social Enterprise Practitioners Draw the Line : Towards an Understanding of Movement from Social Entrepreneurship as Boundary Work. / Purcell, Martin; Seanor, Pam; Bull, Michael; Baines, Susan.

In: International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2014, p. 353-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where Social Enterprise Practitioners Draw the Line

T2 - Towards an Understanding of Movement from Social Entrepreneurship as Boundary Work

AU - Purcell, Martin

AU - Seanor, Pam

AU - Bull, Michael

AU - Baines, Susan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to offer new reflection upon the contested interaction of social enterprises with the public sector. It does this by fore fronting the notions of boundaries, boundary work and boundary objects. Design/methodology/approach-The paper reports qualitative research with social enterprise practitioners (from social enterprises and support agencies) in the north of England. Accounts elicited through interviews are combined with visual data in the form of pencil drawings made by practitioners when the authors invited them to respond to and rework diagrammatic models from the literature about the social and economic dimensions of social enterprise. Findings-Participants explained in words and images how normative images of social enterprise depicting linear and static boundaries inadequately represent the complexity of ideas and interactions in their world. Rather, they perceived an iterative process of crossing and re-crossing boundaries, with identities and practices which appeared to shift over time in relation to different priorities. Research limitations/implications-Through participant generated visual data in which social enterprise practitioners literally redrew models from the literature, the paper open space to show movement, transgression and change. Originality/value-This paper is timely as social enterprises are becoming increasingly prominent in the welfare mix. The authors make novel use of conversations and drawings in order to better understand the dynamic and everyday practices of social enterprise within public services. In doing this, the authors also potentially contribute to richer methodological resources for researching the movement of services between sectors.

AB - Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to offer new reflection upon the contested interaction of social enterprises with the public sector. It does this by fore fronting the notions of boundaries, boundary work and boundary objects. Design/methodology/approach-The paper reports qualitative research with social enterprise practitioners (from social enterprises and support agencies) in the north of England. Accounts elicited through interviews are combined with visual data in the form of pencil drawings made by practitioners when the authors invited them to respond to and rework diagrammatic models from the literature about the social and economic dimensions of social enterprise. Findings-Participants explained in words and images how normative images of social enterprise depicting linear and static boundaries inadequately represent the complexity of ideas and interactions in their world. Rather, they perceived an iterative process of crossing and re-crossing boundaries, with identities and practices which appeared to shift over time in relation to different priorities. Research limitations/implications-Through participant generated visual data in which social enterprise practitioners literally redrew models from the literature, the paper open space to show movement, transgression and change. Originality/value-This paper is timely as social enterprises are becoming increasingly prominent in the welfare mix. The authors make novel use of conversations and drawings in order to better understand the dynamic and everyday practices of social enterprise within public services. In doing this, the authors also potentially contribute to richer methodological resources for researching the movement of services between sectors.

KW - Boundary Objects

KW - Boundary Work

KW - Public Services

KW - Social Enterprise

KW - Transgression

KW - Visual Data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926484327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJPSM-11-2012-0139

DO - 10.1108/IJPSM-11-2012-0139

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 353

EP - 368

JO - International Journal of Public Sector Management

JF - International Journal of Public Sector Management

SN - 0951-3558

IS - 4

ER -