Which alternative communication methods are effective for voiceless patients in Intensive Care Units? A systematic review

Helen Carruthers, Felicity Astin, Wendy Munro

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To assess the effectiveness of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) strategies to enable people who are temporarily voiceless due to medical intervention, to communicate. 

Methods A systematic review informed by a protocol published on an international register. Ten databases were searched from January 2004 to January 2017. Included studies assessed the effect of using AAC strategies on patient related outcomes and barriers to their use. All included studies were quality appraised. Due to the heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures findings were narratively reviewed. 

Results Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review reporting outcomes from 1981 patient and 454 health professional participants. The quality of included studies were moderate to weak. AAC communication strategies increased the number of communication interactions, improved patient satisfaction with communication and reduced communication difficulties. Barriers to usage were device characteristics, the clinical condition of the patient, lack of timeliness in communication and staff constraints. 

Conclusions There is preliminary, but inconsistent evidence that AAC strategies are effective in improving patient satisfaction with communication and reducing difficulties in communication. A lack of comparable studies precluded the identification of the most effective AAC strategy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-96
Number of pages9
JournalIntensive and Critical Care Nursing
Volume42
Early online date29 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Which alternative communication methods are effective for voiceless patients in Intensive Care Units? A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this