Why gender matters in child welfare and protection

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article argues that the lack of a gender analysis in New Labour policy in relation to child welfare and protection has led to problematic gaps at the level of policy and service provision. It explores why the widespread mobilization of terms such as 'parent' and 'child' obscures important and persistent issues in relation to gender equity in care-giving, sexual violence and help-seeking. Whilst there is some attention being paid to the needs of fathers, including the need to involve them in service provision, this attention is tokenistic and inadequately grounded in practice realities. The valorization of the 'new', particularly in the context of a New Labour project grounded in using language in a very considered way, offers opportunities to consider the 'power of language' at the same time as it obscures the 'language of power'. Gender is a particular casualty in such a climate.

LanguageEnglish
Pages294-314
Number of pages21
JournalCritical Social Policy
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

child protection
child welfare
New Labour
gender
language
labor policy
sexual violence
mobilization
father
parents
equity
climate
lack

Cite this

@article{a64f26cd26b4440d971c9c7b06516c03,
title = "Why gender matters in child welfare and protection",
abstract = "This article argues that the lack of a gender analysis in New Labour policy in relation to child welfare and protection has led to problematic gaps at the level of policy and service provision. It explores why the widespread mobilization of terms such as 'parent' and 'child' obscures important and persistent issues in relation to gender equity in care-giving, sexual violence and help-seeking. Whilst there is some attention being paid to the needs of fathers, including the need to involve them in service provision, this attention is tokenistic and inadequately grounded in practice realities. The valorization of the 'new', particularly in the context of a New Labour project grounded in using language in a very considered way, offers opportunities to consider the 'power of language' at the same time as it obscures the 'language of power'. Gender is a particular casualty in such a climate.",
keywords = "Child, Father, Language, Mother, Power",
author = "Brid Featherstone",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0261018306062587",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "294--314",
journal = "Critical Social Policy",
issn = "0261-0183",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Why gender matters in child welfare and protection. / Featherstone, Brid.

In: Critical Social Policy, Vol. 26, No. 2, 01.05.2006, p. 294-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why gender matters in child welfare and protection

AU - Featherstone, Brid

PY - 2006/5/1

Y1 - 2006/5/1

N2 - This article argues that the lack of a gender analysis in New Labour policy in relation to child welfare and protection has led to problematic gaps at the level of policy and service provision. It explores why the widespread mobilization of terms such as 'parent' and 'child' obscures important and persistent issues in relation to gender equity in care-giving, sexual violence and help-seeking. Whilst there is some attention being paid to the needs of fathers, including the need to involve them in service provision, this attention is tokenistic and inadequately grounded in practice realities. The valorization of the 'new', particularly in the context of a New Labour project grounded in using language in a very considered way, offers opportunities to consider the 'power of language' at the same time as it obscures the 'language of power'. Gender is a particular casualty in such a climate.

AB - This article argues that the lack of a gender analysis in New Labour policy in relation to child welfare and protection has led to problematic gaps at the level of policy and service provision. It explores why the widespread mobilization of terms such as 'parent' and 'child' obscures important and persistent issues in relation to gender equity in care-giving, sexual violence and help-seeking. Whilst there is some attention being paid to the needs of fathers, including the need to involve them in service provision, this attention is tokenistic and inadequately grounded in practice realities. The valorization of the 'new', particularly in the context of a New Labour project grounded in using language in a very considered way, offers opportunities to consider the 'power of language' at the same time as it obscures the 'language of power'. Gender is a particular casualty in such a climate.

KW - Child

KW - Father

KW - Language

KW - Mother

KW - Power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645534892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0261018306062587

DO - 10.1177/0261018306062587

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 294

EP - 314

JO - Critical Social Policy

T2 - Critical Social Policy

JF - Critical Social Policy

SN - 0261-0183

IS - 2

ER -