"Why my house?" Exploring the influence of residential housing design on burglar decision making

Rachel Armitage, Chris Joyce

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) has been defined (and redefined) by, amongst others, Crowe (2000), Ekblom (2011) and Armitage (2013). The principles upon which it is based also vary considerably with Poyner (1983) presenting five (surveillance, movement control, activity support and motivational reinforcement), Cozens et al. (2005) presenting seven (defensible space, access control, territoriality, surveillance, target hardening, image and activity support), and Armitage (2013) offering yet another combination of the five principles (physical security, surveillance, movement control, management and maintenance and defensible space). This divergence is not purely a matter of semantics textendash although this issue is important when transferring policy and practice internationally. The principles upon which CPTED are based have been used to inform planning policy and guidance and also to develop practical applications such as the UK's Secured by Design scheme. Conscious that these principles have primarily been developed by academics, police and policy-makers and that they have failed to evolve with developments in housing design, security measures, drug use and ultimately offender modus operandi, this chapter aims to help rectify the imbalance. A sample of twenty-two incarcerated prolific burglars were asked to discuss what they perceived to be the risk and protective factors of sixteen images of residential housing. Interviews were unstructured and participants were encouraged to describe the images in their own words. Whilst confirming the importance of a selection of CPTED principles, the findings cast doubt on the importance of others textendash with obvious practice and policy implications.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationRe-building Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED)
Subtitle of host publicationStrengthening the links with crime science
EditorsRachel Armitage, Paul Ekblom
Place of PublicationOxford, UK
PublisherRoutledge
ISBN (Print)9781138919631
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Fingerprint

environmental design
crime prevention
surveillance
housing
decision making
reinforcement
divergence
drug use
offender
police
semantics
planning
interview
management

Cite this

Armitage, R., & Joyce, C. (2017). "Why my house?" Exploring the influence of residential housing design on burglar decision making. In R. Armitage, & P. Ekblom (Eds.), Re-building Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED): Strengthening the links with crime science Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Armitage, Rachel ; Joyce, Chris. / "Why my house?" Exploring the influence of residential housing design on burglar decision making. Re-building Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED): Strengthening the links with crime science. editor / Rachel Armitage ; Paul Ekblom. Oxford, UK : Routledge, 2017.
@inbook{a7b87372b7174e26950b3b353b4e8709,
title = "{"}Why my house?{"} Exploring the influence of residential housing design on burglar decision making",
abstract = "Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) has been defined (and redefined) by, amongst others, Crowe (2000), Ekblom (2011) and Armitage (2013). The principles upon which it is based also vary considerably with Poyner (1983) presenting five (surveillance, movement control, activity support and motivational reinforcement), Cozens et al. (2005) presenting seven (defensible space, access control, territoriality, surveillance, target hardening, image and activity support), and Armitage (2013) offering yet another combination of the five principles (physical security, surveillance, movement control, management and maintenance and defensible space). This divergence is not purely a matter of semantics textendash although this issue is important when transferring policy and practice internationally. The principles upon which CPTED are based have been used to inform planning policy and guidance and also to develop practical applications such as the UK's Secured by Design scheme. Conscious that these principles have primarily been developed by academics, police and policy-makers and that they have failed to evolve with developments in housing design, security measures, drug use and ultimately offender modus operandi, this chapter aims to help rectify the imbalance. A sample of twenty-two incarcerated prolific burglars were asked to discuss what they perceived to be the risk and protective factors of sixteen images of residential housing. Interviews were unstructured and participants were encouraged to describe the images in their own words. Whilst confirming the importance of a selection of CPTED principles, the findings cast doubt on the importance of others textendash with obvious practice and policy implications.",
author = "Rachel Armitage and Chris Joyce",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138919631",
editor = "Rachel Armitage and Paul Ekblom",
booktitle = "Re-building Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED)",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Armitage, R & Joyce, C 2017, "Why my house?" Exploring the influence of residential housing design on burglar decision making. in R Armitage & P Ekblom (eds), Re-building Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED): Strengthening the links with crime science. Routledge, Oxford, UK.

"Why my house?" Exploring the influence of residential housing design on burglar decision making. / Armitage, Rachel; Joyce, Chris.

Re-building Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED): Strengthening the links with crime science. ed. / Rachel Armitage; Paul Ekblom. Oxford, UK : Routledge, 2017.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - "Why my house?" Exploring the influence of residential housing design on burglar decision making

AU - Armitage, Rachel

AU - Joyce, Chris

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) has been defined (and redefined) by, amongst others, Crowe (2000), Ekblom (2011) and Armitage (2013). The principles upon which it is based also vary considerably with Poyner (1983) presenting five (surveillance, movement control, activity support and motivational reinforcement), Cozens et al. (2005) presenting seven (defensible space, access control, territoriality, surveillance, target hardening, image and activity support), and Armitage (2013) offering yet another combination of the five principles (physical security, surveillance, movement control, management and maintenance and defensible space). This divergence is not purely a matter of semantics textendash although this issue is important when transferring policy and practice internationally. The principles upon which CPTED are based have been used to inform planning policy and guidance and also to develop practical applications such as the UK's Secured by Design scheme. Conscious that these principles have primarily been developed by academics, police and policy-makers and that they have failed to evolve with developments in housing design, security measures, drug use and ultimately offender modus operandi, this chapter aims to help rectify the imbalance. A sample of twenty-two incarcerated prolific burglars were asked to discuss what they perceived to be the risk and protective factors of sixteen images of residential housing. Interviews were unstructured and participants were encouraged to describe the images in their own words. Whilst confirming the importance of a selection of CPTED principles, the findings cast doubt on the importance of others textendash with obvious practice and policy implications.

AB - Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) has been defined (and redefined) by, amongst others, Crowe (2000), Ekblom (2011) and Armitage (2013). The principles upon which it is based also vary considerably with Poyner (1983) presenting five (surveillance, movement control, activity support and motivational reinforcement), Cozens et al. (2005) presenting seven (defensible space, access control, territoriality, surveillance, target hardening, image and activity support), and Armitage (2013) offering yet another combination of the five principles (physical security, surveillance, movement control, management and maintenance and defensible space). This divergence is not purely a matter of semantics textendash although this issue is important when transferring policy and practice internationally. The principles upon which CPTED are based have been used to inform planning policy and guidance and also to develop practical applications such as the UK's Secured by Design scheme. Conscious that these principles have primarily been developed by academics, police and policy-makers and that they have failed to evolve with developments in housing design, security measures, drug use and ultimately offender modus operandi, this chapter aims to help rectify the imbalance. A sample of twenty-two incarcerated prolific burglars were asked to discuss what they perceived to be the risk and protective factors of sixteen images of residential housing. Interviews were unstructured and participants were encouraged to describe the images in their own words. Whilst confirming the importance of a selection of CPTED principles, the findings cast doubt on the importance of others textendash with obvious practice and policy implications.

UR - https://www.routledge.com/Rebuilding-Crime-Prevention-through-Environmental-Design-Strengthening/Armitage-Ekblom/p/book/9781138919631

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138919631

BT - Re-building Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED)

A2 - Armitage, Rachel

A2 - Ekblom, Paul

PB - Routledge

CY - Oxford, UK

ER -

Armitage R, Joyce C. "Why my house?" Exploring the influence of residential housing design on burglar decision making. In Armitage R, Ekblom P, editors, Re-building Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED): Strengthening the links with crime science. Oxford, UK: Routledge. 2017