Why not greater catch-up by Chinese firms? the impact of IPR, corporate governance and technology intensity on late-comer strategies

Yangao Xiao, Andrew Tylecote, Jiajia Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How can 'late-comer firms' (LCFs) in developing economies manage their development of technological capability, and within it their IP, strategically, in order to become fully competitive internationally? Under what conditions, external and internal, are they likely to succeed? This paper develops a theoretical framework for understanding LCFs' technology strategy and predicting its outcome, then applies it to the cases of three Chinese firms in sectors at different levels of technology intensity. This yields insights as to its limitations and further development. These help explain mainland China's very limited catch-up in high technology sectors-and to a lesser extent in medium-high technology. We show how our findings can be reconciled with the much greater success of Korean firms some 20 years earlier, if the effect of corporate governance differences is recognised.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)749-764
Number of pages15
JournalResearch Policy
Volume42
Issue number3
Early online date22 Jan 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Corporate governance
Catch-up
Chinese firms
High technology
Technology strategy
Developing economies
Mainland China
Technological capability
Theoretical framework

Cite this

@article{4b4b2451228b420b979f51dcfc7608a5,
title = "Why not greater catch-up by Chinese firms? the impact of IPR, corporate governance and technology intensity on late-comer strategies",
abstract = "How can 'late-comer firms' (LCFs) in developing economies manage their development of technological capability, and within it their IP, strategically, in order to become fully competitive internationally? Under what conditions, external and internal, are they likely to succeed? This paper develops a theoretical framework for understanding LCFs' technology strategy and predicting its outcome, then applies it to the cases of three Chinese firms in sectors at different levels of technology intensity. This yields insights as to its limitations and further development. These help explain mainland China's very limited catch-up in high technology sectors-and to a lesser extent in medium-high technology. We show how our findings can be reconciled with the much greater success of Korean firms some 20 years earlier, if the effect of corporate governance differences is recognised.",
keywords = "late-comer firms, technological catch-up, intellectual property, corporate governance, chinese manufacturing",
author = "Yangao Xiao and Andrew Tylecote and Jiajia Liu",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2012.11.005",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "749--764",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Why not greater catch-up by Chinese firms? the impact of IPR, corporate governance and technology intensity on late-comer strategies. / Xiao, Yangao ; Tylecote, Andrew; Liu, Jiajia.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 42, No. 3, 01.04.2013, p. 749-764.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why not greater catch-up by Chinese firms? the impact of IPR, corporate governance and technology intensity on late-comer strategies

AU - Xiao, Yangao

AU - Tylecote, Andrew

AU - Liu, Jiajia

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - How can 'late-comer firms' (LCFs) in developing economies manage their development of technological capability, and within it their IP, strategically, in order to become fully competitive internationally? Under what conditions, external and internal, are they likely to succeed? This paper develops a theoretical framework for understanding LCFs' technology strategy and predicting its outcome, then applies it to the cases of three Chinese firms in sectors at different levels of technology intensity. This yields insights as to its limitations and further development. These help explain mainland China's very limited catch-up in high technology sectors-and to a lesser extent in medium-high technology. We show how our findings can be reconciled with the much greater success of Korean firms some 20 years earlier, if the effect of corporate governance differences is recognised.

AB - How can 'late-comer firms' (LCFs) in developing economies manage their development of technological capability, and within it their IP, strategically, in order to become fully competitive internationally? Under what conditions, external and internal, are they likely to succeed? This paper develops a theoretical framework for understanding LCFs' technology strategy and predicting its outcome, then applies it to the cases of three Chinese firms in sectors at different levels of technology intensity. This yields insights as to its limitations and further development. These help explain mainland China's very limited catch-up in high technology sectors-and to a lesser extent in medium-high technology. We show how our findings can be reconciled with the much greater success of Korean firms some 20 years earlier, if the effect of corporate governance differences is recognised.

KW - late-comer firms

KW - technological catch-up

KW - intellectual property

KW - corporate governance

KW - chinese manufacturing

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2012.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2012.11.005

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 749

EP - 764

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 3

ER -