Wildlife Crime: The Problems of Enforcement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Environmental and wildlife crime appear recently to be benefitting from an increasing profile amongst those agencies tasked with their control, as well as receiving growing criminological attention. Despite this, those with responsibilities in this area report that it remains marginalised, receiving limited resources and suffering from a lack of political impetus to push such problems higher up the agenda. This is particularly so for those agencies, such as the police, that may be seen to have many more pressing objectives. This discussion paper considers the problems of relying on an enforcement approach to controlling such offences, taking, as an example, those activities that may be termed 'wildlife crime', focusing on the situation in England and Wales. Firstly, the legislative framework that criminalises harm or exploitation of wildlife is presented, alongside the main enforcement methods used. Next, the problems facing an enforcement approach are critically considered, the key issues being: under-resourcing and marginalisation, the large 'dark-figure' of wildlife crime, the possibility of corruption, the lack of seriousness with which such crimes are viewed, and the lack of deterrent effect. Finally, responses to the problems of enforcement are presented, categorised as either methods to improve enforcement or, as the author advocates, methods which are alternatives to enforcement (such as adopting a crime prevention approach). The paper concludes with suggestions for future research in this field.

LanguageEnglish
Pages125-148
Number of pages24
JournalEuropean Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
Volume17
Issue number2
Early online date16 Feb 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

offense
lack
crime prevention
corruption
exploitation
police
responsibility
resources

Cite this

@article{63c3f1e5ac1744978ce79514a7e87f30,
title = "Wildlife Crime: The Problems of Enforcement",
abstract = "Environmental and wildlife crime appear recently to be benefitting from an increasing profile amongst those agencies tasked with their control, as well as receiving growing criminological attention. Despite this, those with responsibilities in this area report that it remains marginalised, receiving limited resources and suffering from a lack of political impetus to push such problems higher up the agenda. This is particularly so for those agencies, such as the police, that may be seen to have many more pressing objectives. This discussion paper considers the problems of relying on an enforcement approach to controlling such offences, taking, as an example, those activities that may be termed 'wildlife crime', focusing on the situation in England and Wales. Firstly, the legislative framework that criminalises harm or exploitation of wildlife is presented, alongside the main enforcement methods used. Next, the problems facing an enforcement approach are critically considered, the key issues being: under-resourcing and marginalisation, the large 'dark-figure' of wildlife crime, the possibility of corruption, the lack of seriousness with which such crimes are viewed, and the lack of deterrent effect. Finally, responses to the problems of enforcement are presented, categorised as either methods to improve enforcement or, as the author advocates, methods which are alternatives to enforcement (such as adopting a crime prevention approach). The paper concludes with suggestions for future research in this field.",
keywords = "Crime prevention, Deterrence, Enforcement, Environmental crime, Wildlife crime",
author = "Melanie Wellsmith",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10610-011-9140-4",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "125--148",
journal = "European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research",
issn = "0928-1371",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Wildlife Crime : The Problems of Enforcement. / Wellsmith, Melanie.

In: European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, Vol. 17, No. 2, 06.2011, p. 125-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wildlife Crime

T2 - European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research

AU - Wellsmith, Melanie

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Environmental and wildlife crime appear recently to be benefitting from an increasing profile amongst those agencies tasked with their control, as well as receiving growing criminological attention. Despite this, those with responsibilities in this area report that it remains marginalised, receiving limited resources and suffering from a lack of political impetus to push such problems higher up the agenda. This is particularly so for those agencies, such as the police, that may be seen to have many more pressing objectives. This discussion paper considers the problems of relying on an enforcement approach to controlling such offences, taking, as an example, those activities that may be termed 'wildlife crime', focusing on the situation in England and Wales. Firstly, the legislative framework that criminalises harm or exploitation of wildlife is presented, alongside the main enforcement methods used. Next, the problems facing an enforcement approach are critically considered, the key issues being: under-resourcing and marginalisation, the large 'dark-figure' of wildlife crime, the possibility of corruption, the lack of seriousness with which such crimes are viewed, and the lack of deterrent effect. Finally, responses to the problems of enforcement are presented, categorised as either methods to improve enforcement or, as the author advocates, methods which are alternatives to enforcement (such as adopting a crime prevention approach). The paper concludes with suggestions for future research in this field.

AB - Environmental and wildlife crime appear recently to be benefitting from an increasing profile amongst those agencies tasked with their control, as well as receiving growing criminological attention. Despite this, those with responsibilities in this area report that it remains marginalised, receiving limited resources and suffering from a lack of political impetus to push such problems higher up the agenda. This is particularly so for those agencies, such as the police, that may be seen to have many more pressing objectives. This discussion paper considers the problems of relying on an enforcement approach to controlling such offences, taking, as an example, those activities that may be termed 'wildlife crime', focusing on the situation in England and Wales. Firstly, the legislative framework that criminalises harm or exploitation of wildlife is presented, alongside the main enforcement methods used. Next, the problems facing an enforcement approach are critically considered, the key issues being: under-resourcing and marginalisation, the large 'dark-figure' of wildlife crime, the possibility of corruption, the lack of seriousness with which such crimes are viewed, and the lack of deterrent effect. Finally, responses to the problems of enforcement are presented, categorised as either methods to improve enforcement or, as the author advocates, methods which are alternatives to enforcement (such as adopting a crime prevention approach). The paper concludes with suggestions for future research in this field.

KW - Crime prevention

KW - Deterrence

KW - Enforcement

KW - Environmental crime

KW - Wildlife crime

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956281834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://link.springer.com/journal/10610

U2 - 10.1007/s10610-011-9140-4

DO - 10.1007/s10610-011-9140-4

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 125

EP - 148

JO - European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research

JF - European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research

SN - 0928-1371

IS - 2

ER -