Writing as intimate friends…

How does writing profeminist research become methodologically challenging?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This piece of writing was originally planned as an Afterword, entitled ‘How Does Writing Research Become Innovative Forms of Research Writing?’ for an earlier and rather different version of this book conceived around the theme of innovativeness in writing research. For this, the proposed abstract read:

Is this chapter an innovative form(s) of writing research? Are you sure? How can I convince you? You know it makes sense. Are the theories used and alluded to (you know I’ve read and understand some of them, and cited them properly) innovative, or are they used in a cunning, innovative way? IS IT about form?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEmergent Writing Methodologies in Feminist Studies
EditorsMona Livholts
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherRoutledge Taylor & Francis Group
Chapter12
Pages184-198
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781136580246
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Mar 2012

Cite this

Hearn, J. (2012). Writing as intimate friends…: How does writing profeminist research become methodologically challenging? In M. Livholts (Ed.), Emergent Writing Methodologies in Feminist Studies (pp. 184-198). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155332
Hearn, Jeff. / Writing as intimate friends… : How does writing profeminist research become methodologically challenging?. Emergent Writing Methodologies in Feminist Studies. editor / Mona Livholts. New York : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2012. pp. 184-198
@inbook{313f6f9ac6114a29a79ce4c8e0d7256b,
title = "Writing as intimate friends…: How does writing profeminist research become methodologically challenging?",
abstract = "This piece of writing was originally planned as an Afterword, entitled ‘How Does Writing Research Become Innovative Forms of Research Writing?’ for an earlier and rather different version of this book conceived around the theme of innovativeness in writing research. For this, the proposed abstract read:Is this chapter an innovative form(s) of writing research? Are you sure? How can I convince you? You know it makes sense. Are the theories used and alluded to (you know I’ve read and understand some of them, and cited them properly) innovative, or are they used in a cunning, innovative way? IS IT about form?",
author = "Jeff Hearn",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "22",
doi = "10.4324/9780203155332",
language = "English",
pages = "184--198",
editor = "Mona Livholts",
booktitle = "Emergent Writing Methodologies in Feminist Studies",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",

}

Hearn, J 2012, Writing as intimate friends…: How does writing profeminist research become methodologically challenging? in M Livholts (ed.), Emergent Writing Methodologies in Feminist Studies. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp. 184-198. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155332

Writing as intimate friends… : How does writing profeminist research become methodologically challenging? / Hearn, Jeff.

Emergent Writing Methodologies in Feminist Studies. ed. / Mona Livholts. New York : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2012. p. 184-198.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Writing as intimate friends…

T2 - How does writing profeminist research become methodologically challenging?

AU - Hearn, Jeff

PY - 2012/3/22

Y1 - 2012/3/22

N2 - This piece of writing was originally planned as an Afterword, entitled ‘How Does Writing Research Become Innovative Forms of Research Writing?’ for an earlier and rather different version of this book conceived around the theme of innovativeness in writing research. For this, the proposed abstract read:Is this chapter an innovative form(s) of writing research? Are you sure? How can I convince you? You know it makes sense. Are the theories used and alluded to (you know I’ve read and understand some of them, and cited them properly) innovative, or are they used in a cunning, innovative way? IS IT about form?

AB - This piece of writing was originally planned as an Afterword, entitled ‘How Does Writing Research Become Innovative Forms of Research Writing?’ for an earlier and rather different version of this book conceived around the theme of innovativeness in writing research. For this, the proposed abstract read:Is this chapter an innovative form(s) of writing research? Are you sure? How can I convince you? You know it makes sense. Are the theories used and alluded to (you know I’ve read and understand some of them, and cited them properly) innovative, or are they used in a cunning, innovative way? IS IT about form?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902971457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203155332

DO - 10.4324/9780203155332

M3 - Chapter

SP - 184

EP - 198

BT - Emergent Writing Methodologies in Feminist Studies

A2 - Livholts, Mona

PB - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

CY - New York

ER -

Hearn J. Writing as intimate friends…: How does writing profeminist research become methodologically challenging? In Livholts M, editor, Emergent Writing Methodologies in Feminist Studies. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 2012. p. 184-198 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155332