Writing fathers in but mothers out!!!

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the late 1990s a series of government departments have promoted a policy and practice agenda urging practitioners in a range of settings such as school, health care and children's centres to 'engage' fathers. The rationale for this project is that fostering father involvement with children will promote good outcomes particularly for those children who are most disadvantaged. The author suggests that this agenda is normatively undesirable and flawed practically. Gender equality appears to be neither an explicit nor implicit aim. Moreover, by constructing the father-child relationship as dyadic, mothers' contributions to fathering and childcare are obscured. Drawing from a piece of qualitative research with fathers about their experiences of social care services, it would appear, however, that the fathers were preoccupied with mothers and their perceived power. Indeed, they had constructed a world of powerful unpredictable women who were supported by feminized services. Not only is writing mothers out problematic for gender equality purposes, it is also not feasible practically.

LanguageEnglish
Pages208-224
Number of pages17
JournalCritical Social Policy
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

father
equality
gender
qualitative research
health care
school
experience

Cite this

@article{0e7c0075a21f450eb094b395eb2ea52a,
title = "Writing fathers in but mothers out!!!",
abstract = "Since the late 1990s a series of government departments have promoted a policy and practice agenda urging practitioners in a range of settings such as school, health care and children's centres to 'engage' fathers. The rationale for this project is that fostering father involvement with children will promote good outcomes particularly for those children who are most disadvantaged. The author suggests that this agenda is normatively undesirable and flawed practically. Gender equality appears to be neither an explicit nor implicit aim. Moreover, by constructing the father-child relationship as dyadic, mothers' contributions to fathering and childcare are obscured. Drawing from a piece of qualitative research with fathers about their experiences of social care services, it would appear, however, that the fathers were preoccupied with mothers and their perceived power. Indeed, they had constructed a world of powerful unpredictable women who were supported by feminized services. Not only is writing mothers out problematic for gender equality purposes, it is also not feasible practically.",
keywords = "Equality, Gender, Policy, Practice",
author = "Brid Featherstone",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1177/0261018309358290",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "208--224",
journal = "Critical Social Policy",
issn = "0261-0183",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Writing fathers in but mothers out!!! / Featherstone, Brid.

In: Critical Social Policy, Vol. 30, No. 2, 07.05.2010, p. 208-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Writing fathers in but mothers out!!!

AU - Featherstone, Brid

PY - 2010/5/7

Y1 - 2010/5/7

N2 - Since the late 1990s a series of government departments have promoted a policy and practice agenda urging practitioners in a range of settings such as school, health care and children's centres to 'engage' fathers. The rationale for this project is that fostering father involvement with children will promote good outcomes particularly for those children who are most disadvantaged. The author suggests that this agenda is normatively undesirable and flawed practically. Gender equality appears to be neither an explicit nor implicit aim. Moreover, by constructing the father-child relationship as dyadic, mothers' contributions to fathering and childcare are obscured. Drawing from a piece of qualitative research with fathers about their experiences of social care services, it would appear, however, that the fathers were preoccupied with mothers and their perceived power. Indeed, they had constructed a world of powerful unpredictable women who were supported by feminized services. Not only is writing mothers out problematic for gender equality purposes, it is also not feasible practically.

AB - Since the late 1990s a series of government departments have promoted a policy and practice agenda urging practitioners in a range of settings such as school, health care and children's centres to 'engage' fathers. The rationale for this project is that fostering father involvement with children will promote good outcomes particularly for those children who are most disadvantaged. The author suggests that this agenda is normatively undesirable and flawed practically. Gender equality appears to be neither an explicit nor implicit aim. Moreover, by constructing the father-child relationship as dyadic, mothers' contributions to fathering and childcare are obscured. Drawing from a piece of qualitative research with fathers about their experiences of social care services, it would appear, however, that the fathers were preoccupied with mothers and their perceived power. Indeed, they had constructed a world of powerful unpredictable women who were supported by feminized services. Not only is writing mothers out problematic for gender equality purposes, it is also not feasible practically.

KW - Equality

KW - Gender

KW - Policy

KW - Practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952124478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0261018309358290

DO - 10.1177/0261018309358290

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 208

EP - 224

JO - Critical Social Policy

T2 - Critical Social Policy

JF - Critical Social Policy

SN - 0261-0183

IS - 2

ER -