‘You’re basically calling doctors torturers’: stakeholder framing issues around naming intersex rights claims as human rights abuses

Daniela Crocetti, EAG Arfini, Surya Monro, Tray Yeadon-Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article we address activist, patient advocate and medic perspectives on framing intersex, variations of sex characteristics (VSC) and Disorders/differences of Sex Development (DSD/dsd) medical treatment as human rights abuses. Problematic aspects of intersex medical treatment have increasingly been highlighted in national debates and international human rights bodies (IHRBs). Some intersex activists have framed aspects of intersex medical treatment as human rights abuses since the 1990s. Other stakeholders in shaping medical treatment, such as patient advocates and medical professionals, are not always content with human rights framing, or even the term intersex. In order to address the different perspectives in this arena we provide background on the primary rights claims that have arisen followed by key human rights framing of these claims. We provide a short discussion of activism styles, looking at pan-intersex social movements and variation specific patient associations as different styles of health social movements (HSMs). The analysis of stakeholder perspectives on the use of Human Rights strategy in health areas provides a useful case study for medical sociology and policy in general.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSociology of Health & Illness
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 10 Feb 2020

Fingerprint

Human Rights Abuses
human rights
abuse
stakeholder
physician's care
Physiological Sexual Dysfunctions
Medical Sociology
Social Movements
Disorders of Sex Development
Health
Therapeutics
Human Body
Sex Characteristics
medical sociology
health

Cite this

@article{1ecdf48d89fd47d097dda875ab62c57d,
title = "‘You’re basically calling doctors torturers’: stakeholder framing issues around naming intersex rights claims as human rights abuses",
abstract = "In this article we address activist, patient advocate and medic perspectives on framing intersex, variations of sex characteristics (VSC) and Disorders/differences of Sex Development (DSD/dsd) medical treatment as human rights abuses. Problematic aspects of intersex medical treatment have increasingly been highlighted in national debates and international human rights bodies (IHRBs). Some intersex activists have framed aspects of intersex medical treatment as human rights abuses since the 1990s. Other stakeholders in shaping medical treatment, such as patient advocates and medical professionals, are not always content with human rights framing, or even the term intersex. In order to address the different perspectives in this arena we provide background on the primary rights claims that have arisen followed by key human rights framing of these claims. We provide a short discussion of activism styles, looking at pan-intersex social movements and variation specific patient associations as different styles of health social movements (HSMs). The analysis of stakeholder perspectives on the use of Human Rights strategy in health areas provides a useful case study for medical sociology and policy in general.",
keywords = "Intersex, DSD/dsd, Human Rights, Health Social Movements, Evidence Based Activism",
author = "Daniela Crocetti and EAG Arfini and Surya Monro and Tray Yeadon-Lee",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "10",
language = "English",
journal = "Sociology of Health and Illness",
issn = "0141-9889",
publisher = "Blackwell Science Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘You’re basically calling doctors torturers’

T2 - stakeholder framing issues around naming intersex rights claims as human rights abuses

AU - Crocetti, Daniela

AU - Arfini, EAG

AU - Monro, Surya

AU - Yeadon-Lee, Tray

PY - 2020/2/10

Y1 - 2020/2/10

N2 - In this article we address activist, patient advocate and medic perspectives on framing intersex, variations of sex characteristics (VSC) and Disorders/differences of Sex Development (DSD/dsd) medical treatment as human rights abuses. Problematic aspects of intersex medical treatment have increasingly been highlighted in national debates and international human rights bodies (IHRBs). Some intersex activists have framed aspects of intersex medical treatment as human rights abuses since the 1990s. Other stakeholders in shaping medical treatment, such as patient advocates and medical professionals, are not always content with human rights framing, or even the term intersex. In order to address the different perspectives in this arena we provide background on the primary rights claims that have arisen followed by key human rights framing of these claims. We provide a short discussion of activism styles, looking at pan-intersex social movements and variation specific patient associations as different styles of health social movements (HSMs). The analysis of stakeholder perspectives on the use of Human Rights strategy in health areas provides a useful case study for medical sociology and policy in general.

AB - In this article we address activist, patient advocate and medic perspectives on framing intersex, variations of sex characteristics (VSC) and Disorders/differences of Sex Development (DSD/dsd) medical treatment as human rights abuses. Problematic aspects of intersex medical treatment have increasingly been highlighted in national debates and international human rights bodies (IHRBs). Some intersex activists have framed aspects of intersex medical treatment as human rights abuses since the 1990s. Other stakeholders in shaping medical treatment, such as patient advocates and medical professionals, are not always content with human rights framing, or even the term intersex. In order to address the different perspectives in this arena we provide background on the primary rights claims that have arisen followed by key human rights framing of these claims. We provide a short discussion of activism styles, looking at pan-intersex social movements and variation specific patient associations as different styles of health social movements (HSMs). The analysis of stakeholder perspectives on the use of Human Rights strategy in health areas provides a useful case study for medical sociology and policy in general.

KW - Intersex

KW - DSD/dsd

KW - Human Rights

KW - Health Social Movements

KW - Evidence Based Activism

M3 - Article

JO - Sociology of Health and Illness

JF - Sociology of Health and Illness

SN - 0141-9889

ER -