Youth, enterprise, and precarity: or, what is, and what is wrong with, the ‘gig economy’?

Robert MacDonald, Andreas Giazitzoglu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

By taking an historical perspective, and by drawing on our own empirical work from the UK in the 1980s and more recently, we argue three main things. First, we need to understand the particular conditions of ‘the gig economy’ as a concentrated form of a more general de-standardisation of employment that has brought multiple forms of insecure work. Second, although there is clamour and excitement about ‘the gig economy’ in fact it shares strong parallels with earlier forms of insecure enterprise. Third, while not uniform nor as yet fully empirically demonstrated, young adults’ encounters with the ‘gig economy’ and other aspects of the contemporary labour market (such as the ‘low-pay, no-pay’ cycle, self-employment, ‘zero-hours contracts’) appear to be typified by a lack of choice and control, and experiences of disempowerment, low pay, degraded work conditions, alienation, anxiety and insecurity. This stands at odds with more celebratory proclamations about ‘the gig economy’.

LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of Sociology
Early online date3 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

economy
self-employment
alienation
young adult
labor market
anxiety
lack
experience

Cite this

@article{fb8c37a8ead24357831ec54ad0c0df89,
title = "Youth, enterprise, and precarity: or, what is, and what is wrong with, the ‘gig economy’?",
abstract = "By taking an historical perspective, and by drawing on our own empirical work from the UK in the 1980s and more recently, we argue three main things. First, we need to understand the particular conditions of ‘the gig economy’ as a concentrated form of a more general de-standardisation of employment that has brought multiple forms of insecure work. Second, although there is clamour and excitement about ‘the gig economy’ in fact it shares strong parallels with earlier forms of insecure enterprise. Third, while not uniform nor as yet fully empirically demonstrated, young adults’ encounters with the ‘gig economy’ and other aspects of the contemporary labour market (such as the ‘low-pay, no-pay’ cycle, self-employment, ‘zero-hours contracts’) appear to be typified by a lack of choice and control, and experiences of disempowerment, low pay, degraded work conditions, alienation, anxiety and insecurity. This stands at odds with more celebratory proclamations about ‘the gig economy’.",
keywords = "gig economy, enterprise, self-employment, insecurity, young adults, precarity, Youth < Age groups",
author = "Robert MacDonald and Andreas Giazitzoglu",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1177/1440783319837604",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Sociology",
issn = "1440-7833",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Youth, enterprise, and precarity : or, what is, and what is wrong with, the ‘gig economy’? / MacDonald, Robert; Giazitzoglu, Andreas.

In: Journal of Sociology, 03.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Youth, enterprise, and precarity

T2 - Journal of Sociology

AU - MacDonald, Robert

AU - Giazitzoglu, Andreas

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - By taking an historical perspective, and by drawing on our own empirical work from the UK in the 1980s and more recently, we argue three main things. First, we need to understand the particular conditions of ‘the gig economy’ as a concentrated form of a more general de-standardisation of employment that has brought multiple forms of insecure work. Second, although there is clamour and excitement about ‘the gig economy’ in fact it shares strong parallels with earlier forms of insecure enterprise. Third, while not uniform nor as yet fully empirically demonstrated, young adults’ encounters with the ‘gig economy’ and other aspects of the contemporary labour market (such as the ‘low-pay, no-pay’ cycle, self-employment, ‘zero-hours contracts’) appear to be typified by a lack of choice and control, and experiences of disempowerment, low pay, degraded work conditions, alienation, anxiety and insecurity. This stands at odds with more celebratory proclamations about ‘the gig economy’.

AB - By taking an historical perspective, and by drawing on our own empirical work from the UK in the 1980s and more recently, we argue three main things. First, we need to understand the particular conditions of ‘the gig economy’ as a concentrated form of a more general de-standardisation of employment that has brought multiple forms of insecure work. Second, although there is clamour and excitement about ‘the gig economy’ in fact it shares strong parallels with earlier forms of insecure enterprise. Third, while not uniform nor as yet fully empirically demonstrated, young adults’ encounters with the ‘gig economy’ and other aspects of the contemporary labour market (such as the ‘low-pay, no-pay’ cycle, self-employment, ‘zero-hours contracts’) appear to be typified by a lack of choice and control, and experiences of disempowerment, low pay, degraded work conditions, alienation, anxiety and insecurity. This stands at odds with more celebratory proclamations about ‘the gig economy’.

KW - gig economy

KW - enterprise

KW - self-employment

KW - insecurity

KW - young adults

KW - precarity

KW - Youth < Age groups

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064001021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1440783319837604

DO - 10.1177/1440783319837604

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Sociology

JF - Journal of Sociology

SN - 1440-7833

ER -